Catallaxy Files

Australia's leading libertarian and centre-right blog

But would you trust Eddie Ward?

7 comments

A nice story came up at the Sydney Institute last night when a historian told the story of the referendum to get a green light for Menzies to ban the Communist Party.

Arthur Caldwell, not yet leader of the ALP was on a stump or soap box in Sydney with the local member Eddie Ward beside him. [Curtin dismissed Ward as a "bloody ratbag"].

Calwell urged a NO vote on the (mistaken) ground that a Yes would change the Constitution and give the Government of the moment dangerous powers that could only be removed with another referendum.

Would you trust me to have that much power?” shouted Arthur.

Someone in the crowd replied “Yes, I would trust you Arthur”.

Arthur, in desperation, with a gesture towards the local member “But would you trust Eddie Ward?”

Written by Poor Old Rafe

July 24th, 2012 at 11:01 am

Posted in Uncategorized

7 Responses to 'But would you trust Eddie Ward?'

Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack to 'But would you trust Eddie Ward?'.

  1. It’s Calwell Rafe. The last ALP federal leader who had a good measure of integrity and an understanding and feeling of empathy with the workers.

    And why is it not correct to say that a change to the Constitution can only be removed by a later referendum? If you mean that the Menzies referendum should have got up, then you are mistaken. Many Liberals at the time disagreed with Menzies.

    rafiki

    24 Jul 12 at 12:50 pm

  2. At The “Brisbane Line” – A Study in Wartime Politics we can read:

    In the course of an electioneering campaign in Victoria in October 1942 , the Minister for Labour and National Service, Mr Ward, was reported to have stated that when the Curtin Government took office there was in existence a plan, formulated by its predecessors, for the abandonment of an important section of northern Australia without firing a single shot.

    ‘But would you trust Eddie Ward?‘ No! Because Eddie may have been beholding to an overseas power.

    stackja

    24 Jul 12 at 12:58 pm

  3. Stackja, that is a pretty atrocious mis-reading of the paragraph.

    Eddie Ward maintained that the previousgovernments had in place a plan to withdraw from large parts of Australia were there an invasion. This is correlated in the next sentence describing the various UAP leaders denying the existence of such a plan.

    JJP

    24 Jul 12 at 1:20 pm

  4. Thanks rafiki, a referendum is required to change the Constitution, when the Constitution is not at stake it is a plebiscite, like the Conscription “referendums” of WWI.

    The Menzies plebiscite went down by 49.5 to 50.5 after it looked like a landslide Yes vote up to the last week.

    Poor Old Rafe

    24 Jul 12 at 5:01 pm

  5. eddie ward was old school labor: a real hater. His highest contempt was for those who he considered had betrayed the working class.

    Near the end, when asked when he knew that his health was failing, he said it was when he “took a swing at Gough Whitlam, and missed.”

    Jim Rose

    24 Jul 12 at 5:35 pm

  6. I like Eddie Ward: Amid searing exchanges on conscription, Curtin broke down after Ward accused him of ‘putting young men into the slaughterhouse, although thirty years ago you would not go into it yourself’.

    see http://adb.anu.edu.au/biography/ward-edward-john-eddie-11959

    Jim Rose

    24 Jul 12 at 5:37 pm

  7. JJP
    Army plan not government plan.
    “It was in these circumstances that Mackay turned to his task. In his planning he was bound to accept the existing doctrine that there were certain areas vital to the continuance of the economic life of Australia which must be held and to be guided by the arrangements designed to give effect to that doctrine.”

    stackja

    25 Jul 12 at 5:29 pm

Leave a Reply