Comments on: The betrayal of Dan Conway

By: johno

johno — Thu, 13 Dec 2012 21:50:40 +0000

It’s a long time since I last re-read Atlas that I have forgotten how insightful she was.

By: Nick De Cusa

Nick De Cusa — Thu, 13 Dec 2012 18:39:33 +0000

The big problem here is where we have all these “Good Germans” who refuse to admit that this is an open and shut case of science fraud.

By: brc

brc — Thu, 13 Dec 2012 13:01:11 +0000

I don’t know why bolt doesn’t give news the flick and set up a blog in the USA, where the luvvies couldn’t do jack about what he says.

By: M Ryutin

M Ryutin — Thu, 13 Dec 2012 10:54:14 +0000

It is all becoming a bit like a world game, this so-called ‘lawfare’. It is really just simple fraud. ‘Fairness’ in Andrew Bolt reporting is really to stop/control his reporting altogether on certain topics – whether on climate, Aboriginality or whatever (Muslims come next I expect). Fights for ‘environmentally sustainable’development control over oil and other pipelines means “No pipelines and we will do whatever we can to delay them until you give up” (witness the spurious Keystone ad other pipeline campaigns targeted at Canadian oil sands). And so it goes. One day the supine main stream media might call all of it for the fraud that it is, but until then the media enablers of the con artists will continue to assist the fraudsters, unhindered already, as they are, by the weakest of conservative politicians. It is a ‘world game’ because it is international money which washes through all these campaigns, whether it be American money from the Tides and Ford Foundations plus the Sierra Club and its front groups, or local fraudsters.

By: nilk

nilk — Thu, 13 Dec 2012 10:47:37 +0000

That is not his opinion, Gab. He may as well get a job reading the news [sic].

By: Biota

Biota — Thu, 13 Dec 2012 10:37:33 +0000

We are fast heading back to the dark ages and its inquisition.

By: DaveF

DaveF — Thu, 13 Dec 2012 10:34:05 +0000

re: shouting down CAGW sceptics I’ve noticed Angry Anderson has been left alone.

I figure he’s too close to their heart ie anti establishment rocker who unfortuneatly has a different-and wrong, so wrong- opinion from them.

They need to keep their rock icons from their formative years on a pedestal.

Love the luvvies.

By: Gab

Gab — Thu, 13 Dec 2012 10:07:28 +0000

No, Nilk he is allowed to give his opinion as long as it is in concert with government opinion.

By: nilk

nilk — Thu, 13 Dec 2012 10:07:23 +0000

PIMF. I meant “c)anything else the overlords deem fit.”

By: nilk

nilk — Thu, 13 Dec 2012 10:05:16 +0000

Wow, so a man who makes a living writing opinions is not allowed to give his opinions on a)aboriginals and race in general, b)weather – oh, sorry I meant climate and b)anything else the overlords deem fit.

Freedom of speech is so last century.

Jones being sent to re-education camp is another one who has doubleplus ungood opinions.

I guess if they take down those few who do dare to speak out, they expect the rest of the drones will just hunker down and attempt to wait it out.