Catallaxy Files

Australia's leading libertarian and centre-right blog

Keynesian spending drives record world unemployment

4 comments

Well done J M!

World unemployment is on the verge of breaking new records. This trend will continue until 2017. That’s the news from the International Labour Organization (ILO) in their annual employment report.

Currently, 2009 is the record year for world joblessness, at 198 million. In its 2012 Global Employment Trends report (source), the ILO believes unemployment numbers will rise by over 5 million this year to reach 202 million, topping 2009′s record.

The report goes on to predict that unemployment will rise further in 2014, to reach 205 million. “Unemployment remains as dire as it was during the crisis in 2009,” Ekkehard Ernst, chief of the ILO’s employment trends unit, told CNBC.

A serious reservation: how credible are figures for worldwide unemployment? How credible is the ILO? What does unemployment mean in a third world nation? Our own figures are so suspect due to the vagaries of definition and manipulation, what can you make of international figures?

On a similar theme, a spirited challenge to the myth that we are living in a world driven by neo-liberalism.

I often wonder what world folks are looking at, let alone studying, when they make claims that the laissez faire model of economic liberalism is dominant. Every where we turn in our economic lives we can see the grabbing hand of the state. Throughout the western world we have bloated public budgets, the manipulation of money and credit, obstructionist regulations, and numerous measures to weaken the discipline of profit and loss. In short, we have state controlled market economies. We are living the policy reality of mercantilism, while rhetorically emphasizing economic liberalism.

Welfare for the wealthy in the US.

Two decades of record federal spending and expanding regulation have fostered a growing upper class of federal contractors, lobbyists and lawyers in the District of Columbia area. The federal government funneled $83.5 billion their way in defense and other work in 2010 – an increase of more than 300 percent since 1989, even after adjusting for inflation. Private industry poured more than $3 billion into lobbying to influence the government, nearly double what it spent a decade ago.

Like spokes on a wheel, the high-rise offices of this elite radiate out from Capitol Hill along major arteries deep into suburban Maryland and Virginia. The latest Census figures placed 10 of the capital’s surrounding counties in the top 20 nationwide for median household income – up from six in 1990.

On that theme, a telling insight into the minds of the bright young people who drove the Kevin-07 bandwagon and a glimpse inside the belly of the whale of Rudd’s administration,see James Button’s outstanding book Speechless. I only picked it up by accident from the New Books shelf at the public library but could not put it down. It operates at several levels, revealing the mindset of an honest member of the Dead Forest of the Left, Rudd’s dysfunctional style, some aspects of high-level policy-making and administration in Canberra, and the human subtext, the relationship of James with his father and beyond that the relationship of John Button to his own father.

Written by Poor Old Rafe

January 27th, 2013 at 8:55 am

Posted in Uncategorized

4 Responses to 'Keynesian spending drives record world unemployment'

Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack to 'Keynesian spending drives record world unemployment'.

  1. employmant laws have their roles too as explained in http://www.voxeu.org/article/why-spain-s-unemployment-so-high 1 in 3 EU unemployed are Spanish.

    Cahuc et al. estimate that Spanish unemployment would be 40% lower if Spain adopted the less strict French laws!

    Spanish housing laws are so screwed up that most young people must live with their mother. they cannot move to regions of lower unemployment because a short-term contract does not make it worth the risk.

    Jim Rose

    27 Jan 13 at 10:20 am

  2. World unemployment is on the verge of breaking new records. This trend will continue until 2017. That’s the news from the International Labour Organization (ILO) in their annual employment report.

    How much of this panty twisting and hand flailing is due to the fact that the governments in the West have been in a competition to increase costs and price of wages?

    Token

    27 Jan 13 at 10:26 am

  3. see http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/boosting-demand-impedes-recovery-by-raghuram-rajan where he unknowningly gets in touch with his inner Hayek:

    the bust that follows years of a debt-fueled boom leaves behind an economy that supplies too much of the wrong kind of good relative to the changed demand.

    Unlike a normal cyclical recession, in which demand falls across the board and recovery requires merely rehiring laid-off workers to resume their old jobs, economic recovery following a lending bust typically requires workers to move across industries and to new locations…

    The only sustainable solution is to allow the supply side to adjust to more normal and sustainable sources of demand – to ease the way for construction workers and autoworkers to retrain for faster-growing industries.

    The worst thing that governments can do is to stand in the way by propping up unviable firms or by sustaining demand in unviable industries through easy credit.

    Jim Rose

    27 Jan 13 at 7:44 pm

  4. On the reliability of ILO unemployment data, they will a mishmash of official national figures compiled with widely differing methods and levels of diligence. On the other hand, the fact that only glacial progress is being made on data quality means the figures are compiled pretty much the same way as they have for years, so if they say the number of unemployed has never been higher, they are probably right. (Note however that the percentage unemployed – 6.0% – is lower than the 6.4% prevailing a decade ago; see Figure 9 on page 32 of the ILO report).

    Re Beltway Bandits, there are indeed armies of them. When the US government started contracting out decades ago, they may have got the job done cheaper for a time. But the contractors have long since learnt entrepreneurial skills: inventing new problems and proposing themselves as the solution. After many years of this, symbiosis has set in, with the bureaucrats unable to do anything but manage consultant contracts, and the contractors unable to do anything but bid for government work.

    David Brewer

    28 Jan 13 at 2:46 am

Leave a Reply