In November 2011 I was asked to give a presentation on the topic of manufacturing and industry protection. I posted my slides at the time, but given the topic is newsworthy given the exit of Toyota here they are again.
-
Liberty Quotes
Taxing profits is tantamount to taxing success.
— Ludwig von MisesCatallaxy Surveys
Recent Comments
- jumpnmcar on Open Forum: April 19, 2014
- Ivan Denisovich on Guest Post: Natural Instinct – Bias on ABC Insiders; Do the numbers lie?
- A Lurker on Open Forum: April 19, 2014
- Baldrick on Guest Post: Natural Instinct – Bias on ABC Insiders; Do the numbers lie?
- dover_beach on Open Forum: April 19, 2014
- CatAttack on Guest Post: Natural Instinct – Bias on ABC Insiders; Do the numbers lie?
- tomix on Open Forum: April 19, 2014
- Dan on Google reads your emails
- Dan on Google reads your emails
- jumpnmcar on Open Forum: April 19, 2014
- Splatacrobat on Open Forum: April 19, 2014
- entropy on Guest Post: Natural Instinct – Bias on ABC Insiders; Do the numbers lie?
- candy on Guest Post: Natural Instinct – Bias on ABC Insiders; Do the numbers lie?
- Deadman on Guest Post: Natural Instinct – Bias on ABC Insiders; Do the numbers lie?
- Tom on Guest Post: Natural Instinct – Bias on ABC Insiders; Do the numbers lie?
- tomix on Open Forum: April 19, 2014
- Badjack on Guest Post: Natural Instinct – Bias on ABC Insiders; Do the numbers lie?
- entropy on Guest Post: Natural Instinct – Bias on ABC Insiders; Do the numbers lie?
- Senile Old Guy on Open Forum: April 19, 2014
- entropy on Guest Post: Natural Instinct – Bias on ABC Insiders; Do the numbers lie?
- TimT on Guest Post: Natural Instinct – Bias on ABC Insiders; Do the numbers lie?
- tomix on Open Forum: April 19, 2014
- entropy on Open Forum: April 19, 2014
- Deadman on Guest Post: Natural Instinct – Bias on ABC Insiders; Do the numbers lie?
- 1735099 on Guest Post: Natural Instinct – Bias on ABC Insiders; Do the numbers lie?
- Blogstrop on Guest Post: Natural Instinct – Bias on ABC Insiders; Do the numbers lie?
- 1735099 on Open Forum: April 19, 2014
- calli on Open Forum: April 19, 2014
- entropy on Open Forum: April 19, 2014
- 1735099 on Guest Post: Natural Instinct – Bias on ABC Insiders; Do the numbers lie?
-
Recent Posts
- Insiders and Bolt Forum: April 20, 2014
- Guest Post: Natural Instinct – Bias on ABC Insiders; Do the numbers lie?
- Google reads your emails
- Just remember, they’re going to get old too
- Open Forum: April 19, 2014
- Guest Post: Sanjeev Sabhlok – What do Indian elections mean for Australia?
- The new barbarism
- Rafe’s Roundup 18 April
- Land of the free
- Lewandowsky research unethical: Journal editor
- Home on the grange
- Guest Post: Brad Emery – Greens still living in a clean energy fantasy world
- A tale of two airports
- Wednesday Forum: April 16, 2014
- Animal crackers
- Are criminals dumb?
- IPCC: Warming cost are small and less than costs of forcing carbon abatement
- Q&A Forum: April 14, 2014
- Me against the world… or the revenue lobby, at least
- Joseph Benedict Hockey, meet Edward William Foxall
- Monday Forum: April 14, 2014
- Reinventing the wheel
- Restoring trust Labor lost its way to sideline Palmer
- Guest Post: Driftforge – A proposal for Senate reform
- Guest Post: Anon – How magnanimous
- That’s Far North Queensland, mate
- Insiders and Bolt Forum: April 13, 2014
- Government ‘investment’ does not equal growth
- Bureaucratic madness
- Can the ACCC perform a useful service?
Archives
Pages
Blogroll
- 38 South
- ABC The Drum
- Alex
- All about Finance
- all right, all right
- Andrew Bolt
- Andrew McIntyre
- Andrew Norton – New
- Andrew Norton – Old
- Arnold Kling
- Aussie Macro Moments
- Becker – Posner
- Bet Metrix
- Bill Mitchell – billy blog
- Bunyipitude
- Cafe Hayek
- Carpe Diem (New)
- Carpe Diem (Old)
- Causes of the crisis
- Chris Kenny
- Chris Snowdon
- Club Troppo
- Conversable Economist
- Coordination Problem
- Core Economics
- Crapulous Coercion
- Daniel Greenfield
- David Boaz
- Econ Journal Watch
- EconAcademics
- Econbrowser
- EconLog
- Econometrics Beat
- Fama/French
- Fault Lines
- Fear the boom and bust
- Fiscal Times
- Foundation for Economic Education
- Free Banking
- Freedom and Prosperity Academy
- Freedom Watch
- Greg Mankiw
- Guido Fawkes
- Harry Clarke
- Hayek Project
- Hey … What did I miss?
- Homer Paxton
- Ideas@The Centre
- inCISe
- Institutional Economics
- International Liberty
- Jim Rose
- John Cochrane
- John Humphreys
- John Lott
- John Quiggin
- John Taylor
- Journal of Economic Perspectives
- Julie Borowski
- Keith Hennessey
- Larvatus Prodeo
- Legal Insurrection
- Liberty Law Blog
- Loaded Dogma
- Macrobusiness
- Mannkal Foundation
- Marginal Revolution
- Mark the Ballot
- Mark the Graph
- markedlymacrotoo
- Market Urbanism
- Master Resource
- Matt Ridley
- Menzies House
- Michael Oakeshott Association
- Michael Smith
- Minding the Campus
- Miranda Devine
- Money Illusion
- Muck and Mystery
- MyGovCost
- Natural Order – Christopher Lingle
- New Economist
- Niche Modeling
- Nick Cater
- Offsetting Behaviour
- Oliver Hartwich
- On Line Opinion
- Open Capitalism
- Opinion Dominion
- Organizations and Markets
- Other Right
- PERColator
- Peter Martin
- Philippa Martyr
- Piled Higher and Deeper
- Political Calculations
- Pollytics
- Potemkin's Village
- Poverty Cure
- Prick with a fork
- Principles of Forecasting
- Quadrant Online
- Retraction Watch
- Retronaut
- Rhino economics
- ricardian ambivalence
- Robert Murphy
- Roger Kerr (archive)
- School Watch
- Sensible Social Policy
- Simon Jackman
- Skepticlawyer
- Sound Money
- Spiked
- Stephen Dawson
- Stephen Koukoulas
- Steve Schwartz
- Stimulus Watch
- Stop Gillard's Carbon Tax
- Stubborn Mule
- Sustainable Development
- Tax Check
- Tax Foundation
- TaxProf
- The Baseline Scenario
- The Beacon
- The Black Steam Train
- The Moronic Lodge
- The TaxPayers' Alliance
- The Visible Hand
- Think Markets
- Thoughts on Freedom
- Tim Blair
- Tim Worstall
- We are all dead
- William Briggs – Statistician
- Yobbo In Thailand
Meta
In one sense, yes.
Recent events show and prove that entitlement unionism kills industry.
Hell no.
‘sactly
Anyone care to list the industries the Unions have killed/are killing, in this country?
I’ll start:
1. The abattoirs,
2. Vehicle manufacturing,
3. Iron Foundries,
4. Smelters,
5. Fruit canning.
The list is almost endless.
CL
Add to that the burdens imposed by Government in the past six years.
protect from what? the scourge of lower prices
I think assistance (within reason) should be given only to our farming and fishery industries. After all, I’d much rather eat Aussie grown, than trust my luck and my health with so many (dodgy) imports. I also don’t like the idea of selling off our prime agricultural and grazing land – I know it is impossible to up and take the land out of Australia, but all the same, something just doesn’t sit right with me about selling it – I’d much rather we leased it instead.
That being said, land that in the past has been practical to graze or to plant crops, over time and due to drought/climate variability/erosion/soil degradation etc, and now has become marginal land, may be better used for other purposes. Those who are continuing to try and farm on now marginal/water-poor land, and year after year after year are failing to do so, might have to accept that what worked once, can no longer work, and may need Gov’t assistance to relocate into a more productive area where their farming know-how can still be utilised.
p.s. I’m not a member of the Nats, I just believe our drought stricken farmers are the ones who truly need a hand. Imagine the billions that has been spent on the Union…sorry, the car industry, could have instead been used to buy feed and replacement stock.
I disagree.
We should protect our industries against the destruction wrought by trade unions & green-filth over regulation.
Fisk Doctrine NOW!
Labor fought for manufacturing jobs in a way that guaranteed their loss in the long run and is causing such losses in the present. The Abbott government is only 5 months old- still in nappies really- but is fighting for an economic framework to secure manufacturing industry long term.
Bill’s had 3 years in government but wets himself worrying that voters might consider a non-Labor Government as industry’s best chance.
Who really wants a leader who prays for failure?
Slightly less than half.
Many years ago the AMWU was about 400.000 strong under Laurie Short a very sensible Labour man of the ilk of the men who founded the unio movement.time passed and somehow the BlatantSoviet Communist halfpenny ,heeffectively increased membership to under 100.000 ,a socialist “increase ” of 75 per caent if you beleive socialists .the Communist Fascist alp unionists and their Mafia style mates have cot this country dearly,it is time they were Punished.just sawShortass tellingus about the jobs he hassaved Lying Hound,likekevin krap and jooliar giliard ,theycant help Lying can they?wash their mouths out with carbolis soap,mongerels
Unfortunately, the only likely outcome is that even more major defence contracts will go to the rust belt, entrenching union dominance and featherbedding, and eventually equipping our forces with shit quality, over-priced platforms and equipment that don’t go near capability requirements.
Fred Lenin: all your base are belong to us, eh?
Walter Plinge #1186025, posted on February 11, 2014 at 4:53 pm
It seems what we need is a scheme to get at low prices (with thanks to the Lord Chancellor).
I don’t want to go to the drum.
I’m think you are saying that we shouldn’t subsidise even if a foreign competitor does. But what is the alternative? Get out of the market altogether? What if it is a good market for us on all the other reasons. Wait them out? I mean assume that eventually their government runs out of cash. How long can we hold onto the market? The foreign government may well NEVER change?
I suppose if we were flexible enough we could maybe switch to another similar thing. But tooling up takes time and skills and if we are constantly having to shift about and bear those costs as leftist competitors do us over it seems a bit rugged.
Yeah, I know. Lifes not fair. Are we left with suck it up? How do we take the fight to them? I don’t need to hear ” Small, flexible, market driven companioes and smart “differently educated “people.
Yes anti-dumping laws are make work for lawyers.
Yes, by helping to address a decade and a half of falling productivity growth
Protect nothing!
The point is that “protection” doesn’t work. It’s like giving someone painkillers and telling them it’s cured their brain cancer. No; the headache has gone away, temporarily, and the longer you put off fixing the actual problem, the more harm the problem does.
If a company can’t make a profit in the open market, it has a problem. Maybe it’s a shitty company. Maybe it is labouring under shitty regulations, or it has a shitty workforce. “Protection” expends wads of taxpayer’s funds – which, in this country, could be treating sick children, or improving schools – to avoid fixing the problem. Either we are paying useless CEOs to be useless, or we are paying slack workers to chuck sickies, or we are paying to cover up the fact that moronic laws and malformed taxes are killing entire industries.
So no. No support, no tariffs, no anti-dumping laws, nothing. Temporary assistance for natural disasters, if and when they can’t be insured against, nothing more. Everything else is just paying to protect arseholes, be they corporate bludgers, soft-arse workers or fucking worthless politicians.
I think assistance (within reason) should be given only to our farming and fishery industries.
Perhaps more than them, but certainly these, and I agree with the rest of what you’ve written.
An island nation that cannot feed itself is fucked unless it has (or can regain) freedom of the high seas in the event of war.
Because that “unless” isn’t us, and likely never will be (IMO we cannot currently rely on the US), it is vital that Australia have the capacity to feed its own population a rich and balanced diet on its own land.
Australia already has that problem, and throwing money at farmers won’t change anything.
Where’s the diesel going to come from?
No they aren’t, not can they. There’s no framework Abbott can put together that can’t be undermined by a future government. Unless the investor intends to cover costs within 5 years, they are back to the same problem.
Of course there is a framework. It just requires that we get over our experiment with democracy.
Your slides are great, thanks Professor. The only help that might be justified is for infant industries, but only for a short time.
As for the mining boom being over I am not so sure. It looks to me that we had an investment strike owing to the Mining and Carbon Taxes. Projects can be restarted but it takes time to open a mine. China still has a large demand for minerals, but they are now investing in Africa and South America.
It will get more competetive for Australia but we should be in a good position to open up new production. As long as the ALP and the unions are kept out of it…
We should also stop or reduce transfer payments as these are simply transactions of decline. Better for regions like SA or Tasmania to develop trade with other states and cities and overseas where possible. They need to be exporting goods and services.
We do not need to protect industries from foreign competition, but we DO need to protect our industries from destruction by the unions and stifling over-regulation and taxation.
Where the current government has totally lost me is in doing nothing to tackle the unions and put in place a framework that makes business viable in Australia. It has just thrown its hands up and accepted that we are losing everything that made us an industrialised first world nation. I didn’t vote for a government that would stand to the side and watch while the unions beat business into oblivion, I thought I was voting for someone who would step in and stand up to these bullies.
If nobody is brave enough to take the necessary steps to give Australian businesses a fighting chance then we actually do need tariffs back, or else we’ll just lose everything, as is happening now.