Liberty Quote
The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out for himself, without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, and intolerable …
— H. L. MenckenRecent Comments
- Rae on Wednesday Forum: April 25, 2018
- Empire 5:5 on Wednesday Forum: April 25, 2018
- Rob MW on Opinion or Gossip
- Bruce of Newcastle on Wednesday Forum: April 25, 2018
- Empire 5:5 on Wednesday Forum: April 25, 2018
- Top Ender on Wednesday Forum: April 25, 2018
- classical_hero on Opinion or Gossip
- Arky on Wednesday Forum: April 25, 2018
- Rae on Wednesday Forum: April 25, 2018
- Rae on Wednesday Forum: April 25, 2018
- Rob MW on Hamilton on free speech
- Oh come on on Wednesday Forum: April 25, 2018
- cynical1 on Wednesday Forum: April 25, 2018
- Oh come on on Wednesday Forum: April 25, 2018
- Gab on Wednesday Forum: April 25, 2018
- Empire 5:5 on Wednesday Forum: April 25, 2018
- Top Ender on Wednesday Forum: April 25, 2018
- Arky on Wednesday Forum: April 25, 2018
- feelthebern on Wednesday Forum: April 25, 2018
- Rae on Wednesday Forum: April 25, 2018
- Empire 5:5 on Wednesday Forum: April 25, 2018
- miltonf on Hamilton on free speech
- Arky on Wednesday Forum: April 25, 2018
- cohenite on Wednesday Forum: April 25, 2018
- Rae on Wednesday Forum: April 25, 2018
- feelthebern on Hamilton on free speech
- Empire 5:5 on Wednesday Forum: April 25, 2018
- Leo G on Hamilton on free speech
- Arky on Wednesday Forum: April 25, 2018
- feelthebern on Wednesday Forum: April 25, 2018
-
Recent Posts
- Friedman 2018
- Hamilton on free speech
- Leland Yeager 1924 – 2018
- Blinking Bill
- Ryan Ferguson: My 5 Favorite Evil Corporations
- Opinion or Gossip
- In defence of Western Civilisation from our modern vandals
- Tax or Spend
- David Bidstrup: Is public ownership of electricity assets “socialism” or just common sense?
- Wednesday Forum: April 25, 2018
- David Leyonhjelm guest post on nuclear necessity
- You know you are living in a police state when
- Sheltered Workshops
- Canada in the news
- Q&A Forum: April 23, 2018
- No Dr Gigi – We Don’t Want Your Advice
- Wage regulations: yet another measure undermining living standards
- Commission Royale
- Who knows? Maybe the worms really are turning
- Monday Forum: April 23, 2018
- Military priorities
- Barry Brownstein: What Happens When an MBA Student Raised in Communist China Reads Hayek
- Madness is the new normal
- Charley’s War
- Zeev Vinokurov: Cities can grow without gridlock
- The Liberals are not libertarians
- Open Forum: April 21, 2018
- Privatise the ABC: Hysterical reaction edition
- David Bidstrup: Money for nothing
- We love a big Australia — but not so fast
Archives
Pages
Blogroll
- 38 South
- ABC The Drum
- Alex
- All about Finance
- all right, all right
- Andrew Bolt
- Andrew McIntyre
- Andrew Norton – New
- Andrew Norton – Old
- Arnold Kling
- Aussie Macro Moments
- Becker – Posner
- Bet Metrix
- Bill Mitchell – billy blog
- Bob McGee
- Cafe Hayek
- Captain Capitalism
- Carpe Diem (New)
- Carpe Diem (Old)
- Causes of the crisis
- Chalk Bunny
- Chicago University – Pro Market
- Chris Kenny
- Chris Snowdon
- Club Troppo
- Confessions of a College Professor
- Continental Telegraph
- Conversable Economist
- Coordination Problem
- Core Economics
- Crapulous Coercion
- Cryptoeconomics
- Daniel Greenfield
- David Boaz
- Dick Puddlecote
- Dover_Beach
- Econ Journal Watch
- EconAcademics
- Econbrowser
- EconLog
- Econofact
- Econometrics Beat
- Economic Education Initiative
- Essential Hayek
- Fama/French
- Fault Lines
- Fear the boom and bust
- Fiscal Times
- Foundation for Economic Education
- Free Banking
- Freedom and Prosperity Academy
- Freedom Watch
- Greg Mankiw
- Guido Fawkes
- Harry Clarke
- Harry Clarke (Temporary)
- Hayek Project
- Hey … What did I miss?
- Homer Paxton
- How does your MP vote
- Idea[email protected] Centre
- inCISe
- Institutional Economics
- International Liberty
- Jim Rose
- John Cochrane
- John Humphreys
- John Lott
- John Quiggin
- John Taylor
- Journal of Economic Perspectives
- Julie Borowski
- Keith Hennessey
- Legal Insurrection
- Liberty Law Blog
- Liberty Works
- Loaded Dogma
- Macrobusiness
- Mannkal Foundation
- Marginal Revolution
- Mark the Ballot
- Mark the Graph
- markedlymacrotoo
- Market Urbanism
- Master Resource
- Matt Ridley
- Menzies House
- Michael Oakeshott Association
- Michael Smith
- Mikayla Novak
- Minding the Campus
- Miranda Devine
- Money Illusion
- Muck and Mystery
- MyGovCost
- Natural Order – Christopher Lingle
- New Economist
- Niche Modeling
- Nick Cater
- Notes on Liberty
- Offsetting Behaviour
- Oliver Hartwich
- On Line Opinion
- Open Capitalism
- Opinion Dominion
- Other Right
- PERColator
- Peter Martin
- Philippa Martyr
- Piled Higher and Deeper
- Pointman
- Political Calculations
- Potemkin's Village
- Poverty Cure
- Prick with a fork
- Principles of Forecasting
- Quadrant Online
- Quillette
- Raph Koster
- Retraction Watch
- Retronaut
- Rhino economics
- ricardian ambivalence
- Robert Murphy
- Roger Kerr (archive)
- Rosemary Fryth
- School Watch
- Sensible Social Policy
- Skepticlawyer
- Sound Money
- Spiked
- Sports Economist
- Stephen Dawson
- Stephen Koukoulas
- Steve Schwartz
- Stimulus Watch
- Stop Gillard's Carbon Tax
- Streetwise Professor
- Stubborn Mule
- Taking Liberties (Simon Clark)
- Tax Check
- Tax Foundation
- Tax Rambling
- TaxProf
- The Baseline Scenario
- The Beacon
- The Black Steam Train
- The Marcus Review
- The Moronic Lodge
- The TaxPayers' Alliance
- The Visible Hand
- The Wentworth Report
- Think Markets
- Thomas the Think Engine
- Tim Blair
- Tim Worstall
- We are all dead
- William Briggs – Statistician
Meta
Hackers are going to love this BIG FAT PIE.
♬ Aus-tral-ia, fuck yeah! ♫
That should be our new anthem Lad
My ISP is resisting this
What a cash cow for hackers. Essentially this is like a major Keynesian project to fuel the blackmail industry.
Every one has something to hide about their internet and phone activity, and if not you, then a family member will. And even if you don’t have something to hide; 1 just knowing all this stuff about you arms someone all the better to know how to influence you. That’s why google and facebook collect so much of the stuff; and 2 It can be made to look like you do. e.g. you never visit 99% of the stores or places next to where you travel to and from, but just looking at your travel history as presented by metadata won’t make that clear at all. All someone has to do is create the undesirable narrative, produce some weakly correlative metadata and suddenly you have a major PR problem on your hands.
Oh the fun that elections will be
We are now treating the symptoms, and not the basic disease – which is the PC and multiculty delusion that you can go on importing trouble without having more trouble.
I’ll go out on a limb and say that the ability to access historical ‘Metadata’, in arrears, is an effective means to identify and target terrorist networks. It works.
Take for example the London bombings. Would it not have been beneficial to look back at the communication history of the ‘cleanskins’ who perpetrated this atrocity? It would have assisted in scooping up associates and, perhaps, prevent further activity.
Being effective, and being appropriate, are two different issues. Given some of the alleged behaviour of the US Government, and the erratic nature of our government here, I do have serious concerns about the concept.
I’ll end with a quote…sort of.
A voteMetadata is like a rifle; its usefulness depends upon the character of the user.Theodore RooseveltMaterAccording to the Bureau of Statistics, in 2012 there were 81 ISPs with more than 1,000 subscribers in Australia. These range from minnows to whales like Telstra. They start up, go broke, merge all the time. Their staff could be absolutely anyone. Yet, the government wants to make them responsible for collecting and holding our personal information for national security purposes?
They are about as secure as a lemonade stand 50k outside Bagdad.
It seems that there is no liberty that this government is not prepared to sacrifice for what it perceives as winning the approval of a few voters and apparachiks.
Coming soon to an Australia near you.
“Telstra found divulging web browsing histories to law-enforcement agencies without a warrant”
Yes. That’s because the real world doesn’t exist inside an American police drama. It always comes as a shock to dozy types that the government has been checking Australians’ overseas communication, well, probably since they sent mail back to the UK with George III’s mug on the stamps.
There is no right to privacy for overseas communications, and maybe 90%+ of web traffic goes overseas. If they don’t collect it here, they’ll just collect it there and bring it back.
I notice a lot of commentators in the US media are complaining about the militarisation of the police in the wake of the Ferguson riots – even the esteemed Mark Steyn. What do they expect when the country is bristling with guns and ammo? The constabulary have to keep one step ahead at least.
Oops – wrong thread.
I’ve liked Topher’s videos in the past, but this one was incredibly lame.
How apt. You just shot yourself in the foot.
Yeah, I can imagine that the assorted terrorists have never heard of TOR or the 3rd party add-on Whonix. Not to mention a few similar programs on offer. /sarc off
That any person who deliberately engages in nefarious activities on the internet, and uses their own internet “address”, is just bizarre. To be clear, I am not talking about the casual viewing of porn. I am talking about the pedophiles, home bomb makers, terrorists and the like. Sure, those people are not necessarily known for their intellectual capacity……
We should not loose sight of the probability that even the dumbist terrorist is likely being guided by smarter superiors who will be fully conversant with methods to frustrate monitoring of their internet activities and communications.
Therefore, given that only the most stupid terrorist is likely to be caught by metadata review (and would be caught otherwise), the issue for me becomes one of the creeping erosion of my privacy. Trite responses about the “world we live in” don’t cut it. And frankly, I don’t trust the Government with the information.
Today’s excuse is that terrorists are the target. Ok, what about next time? Which group will sufficiently arouse interest and warrant monitoring of their internet activities “in the national interest”?
Cats, we live in a rapidly changing world. Guard your privacy because once lost, it will not be returned.
How so?
I said that, as a tool, it works, but I have severe reservations about the governments misusing it if available.
Sorry,
Topher is looking more and more like Benedict Cumberbatch, a bit less of Khan Singh & a bit more of Julian Assange .
In both cases I felt totally ripped off!
So what, you can look at someone’s record two years after they blow something up?
No. You can look at their activity for the two years prior to blowing something up. If you can’t see the potential benefit for an investigation into a terrorist network, I’m not going to waste my time explaining it.