A report from ground level in Venezuela via Rebel News.
Liberty Quote
Nothing can be more abhorrent to democracy than to imprison a person or keep him in prison because he is unpopular. This is really the test of civilization.
— Winston ChurchillRecent Comments
- egg_ on Thursday Forum: February 7, 2019
- egg_ on Thursday Forum: February 7, 2019
- Geriatric Mayfly on Thursday Forum: February 7, 2019
- areff on Thursday Forum: February 7, 2019
- stevem on The problem with electric cars
- EvilElvis on Thursday Forum: February 7, 2019
- Confused Old Misfit on Thursday Forum: February 7, 2019
- Stimpson J. Cat on Thursday Forum: February 7, 2019
- egg_ on Why wind won’t work to provide reliable power Mk III
- Tel on Thursday Forum: February 7, 2019
- mh on Thursday Forum: February 7, 2019
- Overburdened on State of the Union one day later
- zyconoclast on Thursday Forum: February 7, 2019
- Overburdened on State of the Union one day later
- Bruce of Newcastle on Thursday Forum: February 7, 2019
- Stimpson J. Cat on Thursday Forum: February 7, 2019
- Geriatric Mayfly on Thursday Forum: February 7, 2019
- Infidel Tiger on Thursday Forum: February 7, 2019
- Stimpson J. Cat on Thursday Forum: February 7, 2019
- Infidel Tiger on Thursday Forum: February 7, 2019
- Tel on Thursday Forum: February 7, 2019
- zyconoclast on Thursday Forum: February 7, 2019
- incoherent rambler on Thursday Forum: February 7, 2019
- Makka on Thursday Forum: February 7, 2019
- Stimpson J. Cat on Thursday Forum: February 7, 2019
- incoherent rambler on Thursday Forum: February 7, 2019
- Stimpson J. Cat on Thursday Forum: February 7, 2019
- zyconoclast on Thursday Forum: February 7, 2019
- Tel on Thursday Forum: February 7, 2019
- Infidel Tiger on Thursday Forum: February 7, 2019
-
Recent Posts
- Why wind won’t work to provide reliable power Mk III
- State of the Union one day later
- The problem with electric cars
- Thursday Forum: February 7, 2019
- Where’s Wally? I mean wind and solar?
- New York shows the Democrat way of the future in the US
- The Lomborg newsletter
- State of the Union @ 1:00 pm AEDT
- George Polites RIP
- Dr Ken’s lessons on how to respond to criticism
- Inside Venezuela
- Where’s Voldemort?
- Q&A Forum: February 4, 2019
- Super elephant in the hearing room
- Populist conservatism
- Go hard, go early and go to households
- Never commit to do something before you know what it is
- Make the other half work too
- The world is watching you Jack Watts
- Monday Forum: February 4, 2019
- Viv Forbes. A modern mania
- 100% green power. What could go wrong?
- Days of power and fury: January 2019 electricity prices and outages
- Just a few names that come to mind …
- Plenty of Money — In Wrong Hands
- But if you are interested in an actual blood sport there is the SOTU on Wednesday at 1:00 pm AEDT
- Jobs jobs jobs
- To help you watch the Superbowl
- Deadly white colonists caused the Little Ice Age
- Open Forum: February 2, 2019
Archives
Pages
Blogroll
- 38 South
- ABC The Drum
- AEI Ideas
- Alex
- All about Finance
- all right, all right
- Andrew Bolt
- Andrew McIntyre
- Andrew Norton – New
- Andrew Norton – Old
- Arnold Kling
- Aussie Macro Moments
- Becker – Posner
- Bet Metrix
- Bill Mitchell – billy blog
- Bob McGee
- Cafe Hayek
- Calculated Risk
- Captain Capitalism
- Carpe Diem (New)
- Carpe Diem (Old)
- Causes of the crisis
- Chalk Bunny
- Charles Richardson
- Chicago University – Pro Market
- Chris Kenny
- Chris Snowdon
- Club Troppo
- Confessions of a College Professor
- Consumer Choice Center
- Continental Telegraph
- Conversable Economist
- Coordination Problem
- Core Economics
- Crapulous Coercion
- Cryptoeconomics
- Daniel Greenfield
- David Boaz
- Dick Puddlecote
- Dover_Beach
- Econ Journal Watch
- EconAcademics
- Econbrowser
- EconLog
- Econofact
- Econometrics Beat
- Economic Education Initiative
- Essential Hayek
- Fama/French
- Fault Lines
- Fear the boom and bust
- Fiscal Times
- Foundation for Economic Education
- Free Banking
- Freedom and Prosperity Academy
- Freedom Watch
- Greg Mankiw
- Guido Fawkes
- Harry Clarke
- Harry Clarke (Temporary)
- Hayek Project
- Head Rambles
- Hey … What did I miss?
- Homer Paxton
- How does your MP vote
- [email protected] Centre
- inCISe
- Institutional Economics
- International Liberty
- Jim Rose
- John Cochrane
- John Humphreys
- John Lott
- John Quiggin
- John Taylor
- Journal of Economic Perspectives
- Julie Borowski
- Keith Hennessey
- Legal Insurrection
- Liberty Law Blog
- Liberty Works
- Loaded Dogma
- Macrobusiness
- Mannkal Foundation
- Marginal Revolution
- Mark the Ballot
- Mark the Graph
- markedlymacrotoo
- Market Urbanism
- Master Resource
- Matt Ridley
- Menzies House
- Michael Oakeshott Association
- Michael Smith
- Mikayla Novak
- Minding the Campus
- Miranda Devine
- Money Illusion
- Muck and Mystery
- MyGovCost
- Natural Order – Christopher Lingle
- New Economist
- Niche Modeling
- Nick Cater
- Notes on Liberty
- Offsetting Behaviour
- Oliver Hartwich
- On Line Opinion
- Open Capitalism
- Opinion Dominion
- Other Right
- Paul Johnson Archives
- PERColator
- Peter Martin
- Philippa Martyr
- Piled Higher and Deeper
- Pointman
- Political Calculations
- Potemkin's Village
- Poverty Cure
- Prick with a fork
- Principles of Forecasting
- Quadrant Online
- Queensland Economy Watch
- Quillette
- Raph Koster
- Retraction Watch
- Retronaut
- Rhino economics
- ricardian ambivalence
- Robert Murphy
- Roger Kerr (archive)
- Rosemary Fryth
- School Watch
- Sensible Social Policy
- Skepticlawyer
- Sound Money
- Spiked
- Sports Economist
- Statista
- Stephen Dawson
- Stephen Koukoulas
- Steve Schwartz
- Stimulus Watch
- Stop Gillard's Carbon Tax
- Streetwise Professor
- Stubborn Mule
- Taking Liberties (Simon Clark)
- Tax Check
- Tax Foundation
- Tax Rambling
- TaxProf
- The Baseline Scenario
- The Beacon
- The Black Steam Train
- The Marcus Review
- The Moronic Lodge
- The TaxPayers' Alliance
- The Visible Hand
- The Wentworth Report
- Think Markets
- Thomas the Think Engine
- Tim Blair
- Tim Worstall
- We are all dead
- William Briggs – Statistician
Meta
Hugo Chávez the darling of the MSM.
So, having agitated for billions of tax-payer dollars spent cramming failed technology into the electricity grid, the green grifters in the renewables racket are proposing more tax-payer money for people not to use it?
Energy users could be paid to reduce use
https://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/breaking-news/energy-users-could-be-paid-to-reduce-use/news-story/ebd5cc3c795177bdd922ad398fa9d535
Austrazuaela, you’re standing in it.
The latest from Paul Bugman (Jan. 29, 2019):
In fact, whenever you see someone playing the man, using “shut up” words like “white supremacist” and refusing to address the issue, you know right away that the person in question is uninformed, dishonest, or both. It basically shows that the speaker or writer isn’t willing to engage in serious discussion, preferring to scare people with a boogeyman of which he or she knows nothing.
Ahhh time for a quick fact check … has Venezuela “always been a one-industry economy”? Do a 20 second search on Wikipedia for starters:
So that’s one thing that he quite literally got wrong … although over time they increased their dependency on oil, it certainly wasn’t ALWAYS that way. Gosh, more than half the GDP … that’s quite a bit. They easily had the capability to feed themselves, nice!
Has Venezuela always had “huge inequality”? Well you might guess he’s wrong about that as well, but here’s a reference from Oxfam:
https://oxfamblogs.org/fp2p/venezuela-latin-americas-inequality-success-story/
That was written in 2008, right in the middle of the Chávez wealth redistribution … so we can conclude that wealth was indeed successfully redistributed, and inequality was successfully reduced. It didn’t fix a broken economy but the statistics were exactly what the supporters of redistribution were looking to achieve, so don’t blame “inequality” for the failure.
Did Hugo Chavez “seize the oil sector”? Actually no, the Venezuelan oil industry was nationalized by Carlos Andrés Pérez, in 1976 when Hugo Chávez was only 21 years old. The oil sector was already nationalized well before Hugo Chávez but it became more politicized after 2002. That’s quite a different question, but here is the relevant comment from Wikipedia:
The performance of PDVSA did degrade, it’s hard to say that was caused by corruption … mostly sacking all the competent people ends up leaving you with incompetent people. Most of the analysts claim that the problem with PDVSA has been lack on investment, aging equipment, etc. Profits of PDVSA were redistributed to social programs instead of going into expanding the business … but wait! Redirecting profits away from business and into social programs is exactly what people like Elizabeth Warren, Kamala Harris, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Bernie Sanders all support … so if this counts as “corrupt cronies” then we have to apply the same rules to the Domcrat Party surely. Running a sector “honestly and efficiently” must include reinvestment to ensure continuation of the industry rather than sucking it dry for redistribution purposes. There’s zero chance of AOC being capable of understanding this.
The ONLY thing that Bugman got right in the above quote is that there was money printing … and these things almost always descend into money printing, but wait again! AOC openly supports MMT which is perfectly literally money printing! MMT says, don’t worry about budgets, print first, consequences later.
Tel
#2926010, posted on February 5, 2019 at 3:20 pm
Is the author’s name really Paul Bugman? Combined with the “inaccuracy” and general desperate special pleading, it’s got me wondering whether it’s a very clever satire site. So hard to tell these days.
Tim, I humbly apologize … autocorrect is something I often struggle with … but the gist of my point stands (once you fix a few small typos).
It was not my intent to insult any bugs!!
The site where I got the story is called “New York Times” (search on that quote above if you have never heard of them) which is not to the best of my knowledge written by the same people who do The Onion but I understand why so many people confuse the two.
Ah, I see.
The real name is Krudman, or something like that.
Apologies for being so obtuse.
Hes “no ’lation “ to the krudster is he Tim ? that and the NYT would account for the lies and lack of research. Venezuela the pearl of progessive success ,innit?
At its best, Pedevesa was a corrupt, plodding NOC, like so many others.
Innovation?
Don’t make me laugh.
The big mistake many made back then was thinking things could only get better.
Venezuela? What Venezuela? Never heard of it.
On a completely unrelated matter, let’s talk about reintroducing marginal income tax rates of 90%.
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2019/jan/30/historian-berates-billionaires-at-davos-over-tax-avoidance
Because “it worked in the United States of America”. This wasn’t the first time a non-economist has used a univariate analysis of the economy to give credit to their hobby horse, and it won’t be the last.
But boy do the kids love this “ballsy” “historian” sticking it to the man. [ https://imgur.com/gallery/pLTvxHb ] Yay for higher taxes on the rich, upvote upvote.
From Vox I find this is the same guy whose “book Utopia for Realists is a passionate argument for Universal Basic Income, open borders, and a 15-hour workweek as important and achievable goals.”
There you have it, weekly holidays and a guaranteed income for me, but 70% taxes and the threat of the withdrawal of the “social license to operate” for you. That’s what I call equality!
Remember Chomsky’s admonishment, Venezuela is not *true* socialism, it’s State Capitalism, the word capitalism being preceded by a grimace, pronounced with contempt, and terminated with a spitball.
But then how is any tax-funded programme not also State Capitalism? Isn’t federally-funded education, defense, and healthcare currently State Capitalism too? Gosh old Noam must have so many enemies… on the left!
Chavez was certainly saying all the right socialist words back in 2005:
Clearly we should interpret this explicit reference to “true socialism” as hollow rhetoric from just another politician who talked the talk but didn’t walk the walk.
Chomsky’s favoured alternative is “Anarcho-syndicalism” where the means of production are collectively owned by sector and region-specific groups, not by a federal government. This sounds like basically a bunch of corporations that aren’t officially owned by any single person, but then neither is any publicly listed company on the very capitalist stock-exchange. The difference appears to be that workers have earned their influence over the operation of the syndicate by merit of their work for it, whereas capitalist shareholders are masters of the “pay to win” game of the stock market without earning their voting rights and dividends by any labour or skill in that corporation. So you see to be the sort of socialism that Chomsky would approve, you’d have to reorganise control of production into socialist workers councils.
Oh wait, Chavez did that too.
https://www.greenleft.org.au/content/venezuela-new-demands-workers-control
I doubt there’s many cars being sold on the street today in Caracas, so that would be mission accomplished then? Shame about the food and medicine though.
Hit the panic button, put that web site straight down the memory hole.
Venezuela? What Venezuela? Never heard of it.
Oh, that was the great mistake?? How silly of us not to see that and know that we need to just get it right next time. As if.
What happened in Venezuela is Socialism 101. Grab whatever looks good for your cronies and hold on tight. If it doesn’t go belly up sooner, don’t worry it will always go belly up later. Socialists have no idea of what makes an economy tick. And they never will have, because under socialism, the ticking heart of economies dies stone cold dead. It’s a feature, not a bug.