A stable climate

There are two futures for the Earth. One is where there is insufficient ‘dark matter’ and the expansion of the universe continues ad infinitum. In this case the Sun will – in around 5000 million years – expand out to Venus and then collapse and cool, and the temperature of the Earth will move and settle at a stable -273.15 degrees Celsius – absolute zero. It would then remain at this stable climate for the rest of eternity.

The other future is that there is sufficient ‘dark matter’ and the expansion of the universe is halted and reversed and the matter of the universe forms a new singularity with extremely high temperatures (having endured the expansion and collapse of the Sun as above).

Both futures are not conducive to life, although at least with the latter there could be another big bang and ultimately life would evolve again.

As an aside, is the definition of a budget balance now equal to a deficit of $273.15 billion?

Now the Chief Justice of the NSW Land and Environment Court, Brian Preston, like so many of his fellow travellers, seems to think that activities that emit carbon dioxide should be banned. Since all animal life emit CO2, is he proposing to ban breathing too? Endangered species emit CO2 – if saving the planet is more important than saving a species surely we must encourage extinction?

But what are we preserving the planet for, if not for life? Life creates and emits CO2, yet we want to ban CO2 emissions leading to a conundrum. Effectively the Greens are saying we should control the amount of life on the planet. Not by some invisible hand, but by a UN cabal. And a cabal which doesn’t wear hairshirts but continues to enjoy a high emission lifestyle while condemning the majority of the population to serfdom. Is this the future they strive for – a return to pre-enlightenment days when a small elite enjoyed an expensive lifestyle while the vast majority slave away in poverty to appease the climate god? Inequality was much, much greater in those baleful days.

And can’t we learn from history about attempts to control human populations that have been tried from time to time all ending in disaster. We are witnessing yet more hubris by those who pretend to know and can control the climate. Whether it be genocide or eugenics the results are equally vile and evil.

About Lucius Quinctius Cincinnatus

I'm a retired general who occasionally gets called back to save the republic before returning to my plough.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

16 Responses to A stable climate

  1. Bruce of Newcastle

    All uranium on Earth was synthesised by another star.
    Maybe that’s why Greens don’t like nuclear energy.
    They’re parochial Sollists.

  2. Eyrie

    Still a believer in Dark Matter huh?
    A concept plucked from the nether regions of cosmologists and astronomers.
    “Then magic happens”.
    As for the UN, reminds me of “The Expanse”. 30 billion people on Earth, most in poverty and it is all run by the UN and our protagonists never entertain the thought that that is the problem.

  3. jupes

    Now the Chief Justice of the NSW Land and Environment Court, Brian Preston

    How do fuckwits like this get a job?

    More importantly how do they keep it? There is a Liberal government in NSW and if they had one shred of credibility on energy matters then they would sack his sorry arse asap. Oh wait … don’t they have an environment minister who wants 100% ‘renewables’?

  4. duncanm

    Still a believer in Dark Matter huh?

    well – there’s that pesky missing mass.

  5. struth

    Desperation is a west so successful the communists only have an always changing climate as an excuse for tyranny.

  6. jupes

    Desperation is a west so successful the communists only have an always changing climate as an excuse for tyranny.

    Sure but how are they getting away with it?

  7. egg_

    They’re parochial Sollists.

    Even worse, the Neopagans won’t hear of space weather – it’s all anthropogenic causes to them – repent or die, carbon sinner!

  8. A Lurker

    But what are we preserving the planet for, if not for life? Life creates and emits CO2, yet we want to ban CO2 emissions leading to a conundrum. Effectively the Greens are saying we should control the amount of life on the planet. Not by some invisible hand, but by a UN cabal. And a cabal which doesn’t wear hairshirts but continues to enjoy a high emission lifestyle while condemning the majority of the population to serfdom. Is this the future they strive for – a return to pre-enlightenment days when a small elite enjoyed an expensive lifestyle while the vast majority slave away in poverty to appease the climate god? Inequality was much, much greater in those baleful days.

    Sounds like the premise for The Hunger Games.
    Life imitates art.

  9. egg_

    Greens are from the parallel clown universe.

  10. Boambee John

    Lurker

    Sounds like the premise for The Hunger Games.
    Life imitates art.

    The fascist left are so sold on their own “narrative” that they can’t see that they are the supporters of the President Snow regime.

  11. Mark M

    “Sources have estimated the cost of running UN talks to be in the range of $80-100 million.”

    Chile names first woman in eight years to lead UN climate summit

    https://www.climatechangenews.com/2019/01/31/chile-names-first-woman-eight-years-lead-un-climate-talks/

  12. Chris M

    No need to fret your head about silly science fiction stuff Luci. There is an owner, he gets to choose. First the judgement of all mankind (incl you and me) and some time after the punishment and destruction of the wicked the earth will be destroyed.

    2Peter 3v7 “But the heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men…. The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering towards us, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance. But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up.”

  13. Tel

    Sure but how are they getting away with it?

    A free market can sell you anything you want, but it cannot give purpose to your life … only you can do that. People want to be told their lives have meaning so they are searching for an imaginary disaster to make themselves into imaginary heros.

  14. stackja

    jupes – they get away with it, because schools today teach socialism. And MSM feed them disinformation.

  15. Kneel

    “…because schools today teach socialism.”

    Nah – they don’t teach anything, although they do indoctrinate.

  16. John Stankevicius

    Tel – I had a conversation with a sensible scientist who said that solar panels on rooftops are a waste – best if you had scale. I saw an interview with a 91 yr old physasist /mathematician who has been studying climate for 60 years. When asked why CO2is targeted he said because it is the one thing we can control. People are looking for something.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.