Liberty Quote
The statesman who should attempt to direct private people in what manner they ought to employ their capitals, would … assume an authority which could safely be trusted, not only to no single person, but to no council or senate whatever, and which would nowhere be so dangerous as in the hands of a man who had folly and presumption enough to fancy himself fit to exercise it.
— Adam SmithRecent Comments
- Salvatore, Iron Publican on Open Forum: September 28, 2019
- Tel on How much tax payer money has been wasted on the NBN?
- egg_ on Open Forum: September 28, 2019
- Tel on Germany in decline and Kohler on the failure of democracy compared with China
- dover_beach on Open Forum: September 28, 2019
- egg_ on Open Forum: September 28, 2019
- Roger on Open Forum: September 28, 2019
- egg_ on Open Forum: September 28, 2019
- Elizabeth (Lizzie) Beare on Open Forum: September 28, 2019
- bespoke on Open Forum: September 28, 2019
- 132andBush on Open Forum: September 28, 2019
- mh on Open Forum: September 28, 2019
- Ellie on Open Forum: September 28, 2019
- egg_ on Open Forum: September 28, 2019
- Bruce of Newcastle on Open Forum: September 28, 2019
- max on Germany in decline and Kohler on the failure of democracy compared with China
- egg_ on Open Forum: September 28, 2019
- Ƶĩppʯ (ȊꞪꞨV) on Open Forum: September 28, 2019
- Elizabeth (Lizzie) Beare on Open Forum: September 28, 2019
- Exit Stage Right on Open Forum: September 28, 2019
- Crossie on C.L. : The cruel and creepy ABC
- Anthony on Open Forum: September 28, 2019
- johanna on Open Forum: September 28, 2019
- johanna on Open Forum: September 28, 2019
- Ellie on Open Forum: September 28, 2019
- Elizabeth (Lizzie) Beare on Open Forum: September 28, 2019
- Empire 5:5 on C.L. : Sequel flops at the box office
- Crossie on Open Forum: September 28, 2019
- max on C.L. : The cruel and creepy ABC
- JohnL on How much tax payer money has been wasted on the NBN?
-
Recent Posts
- Germany in decline and Kohler on the failure of democracy compared with China
- C.L. : The cruel and creepy ABC
- Open Forum: September 28, 2019
- A soul sickness unto political death
- We should be afraid of rising fuel costs, not climate claims
- How much tax payer money has been wasted on the NBN?
- Some people never learn
- Costello joins the resistance
- What did Remainers think was going to happen?
- John Comnenus: The Trumpman Show
- Political Purpose
- Impending climate and energy primer + Andrew Norton at work
- Free speech as an economic principle
- Epistemic Humility
- C.L. : Sequel flops at the box office
- The left is dissolving right before our eyes
- Midweek climate roundup 26 September
- Trump’s speech to the UN
- If you can’t settle the science, settle the policy
- Welcome to Richo Land
- Can we just clear this up
- The Regulatory Roundabout
- They really might impeach Trump after all
- David Bidstrup: The hole’s not deep enough, we’d better keep digging.
- David Leyonhjelm. Owning your own mind
- The worst form of government, except for all those other forms that have been tried from time to time
- Watching Westminster burn
- Anti-trust targets size
- Peter Ridd Legal Action Fund
- C.L. : Hysteria
Archives
Pages
Blogroll
- 38 South
- ABC The Drum
- AEI Ideas
- Alex
- all right, all right
- Andrew Bolt
- Andrew McIntyre
- Andrew Norton – New
- Andrew Norton – Old
- Arnold Kling
- Aussie Macro Moments
- Becker – Posner
- Bill Mitchell – billy blog
- Bob McGee
- Cafe Hayek
- Calculated Risk
- Captain Capitalism
- Carpe Diem (New)
- Carpe Diem (Old)
- Causes of the crisis
- Chalk Bunny
- Charles Richardson
- Chicago University – Pro Market
- Chris Snowdon
- Club Troppo
- Confessions of a College Professor
- Consumer Choice Center
- Continental Telegraph
- Conversable Economist
- Coordination Problem
- Core Economics
- Cryptoeconomics
- Daniel Greenfield
- Dick Puddlecote
- Econ Journal Watch
- EconAcademics
- Econbrowser
- EconLog
- Econofact
- Econometrics Beat
- Economic Education Initiative
- Essential Hayek
- Fama/French
- Fault Lines
- Fiscal Times
- Foundation for Economic Education
- Freedom and Prosperity Academy
- Greg Mankiw
- Guido Fawkes
- Harry Clarke
- Harry Clarke (Temporary)
- Head Rambles
- Homer Paxton
- How does your MP vote
- Institutional Economics
- International Liberty
- Islam and Liberty Network
- Jim Rose
- John Cochrane
- John Lott
- John Quiggin
- John Taylor
- Journal of Economic Perspectives
- Julie Borowski
- Keith Hennessey
- Legal Insurrection
- Liberty Law Blog
- Liberty Works
- Loaded Dogma
- Macrobusiness
- Mannkal Foundation
- Marginal Revolution
- Mark the Ballot
- Mark the Graph
- markedlymacrotoo
- Market Urbanism
- Master Resource
- Matt Ridley
- Menzies House
- Michael Oakeshott Association
- Michael Smith
- Miranda Devine
- Money Illusion
- MyGovCost
- Natural Order – Christopher Lingle
- New Economist
- Notes on Liberty
- Offsetting Behaviour
- Oliver Hartwich
- On Line Opinion
- Opinion Dominion
- Paul Johnson Archives
- Peter Martin
- Philippa Martyr
- Piled Higher and Deeper
- Pointman
- Political Calculations
- Potemkin's Village
- Poverty Cure
- Prick with a fork
- Principles of Forecasting
- Quadrant Online
- Queensland Economy Watch
- Quillette
- Raph Koster
- Retraction Watch
- Rhino economics
- ricardian ambivalence
- Robert Murphy
- Roger Kerr (archive)
- Rosemary Fryth
- Skepticlawyer
- Sound Money
- Spiked
- Sports Economist
- Statista
- Stop Gillard's Carbon Tax
- Streetwise Professor
- Stubborn Mule
- Taking Liberties (Simon Clark)
- Tax Foundation
- Tax Rambling
- TaxProf
- The Baseline Scenario
- The Black Steam Train
- The Marcus Review
- The Moronic Lodge
- The TaxPayers' Alliance
- The Visible Hand
- The Wentworth Report
- Think Markets
- Thomas the Think Engine
- Tim Blair
- Tim Worstall
- William Briggs – Statistician
Meta
and NDIS
The damage caused by the government’s NBN is not limited to the money that has been directly wasted on it. The centralized planning and control, and the inhibition of innovation and development in Australia’s telecommunications means that the NBN will the internet equivalent of the Trabant in the automobile industry.
The NDIS is an abuse of disabled people and their carers. Taking resources out localized services that meet community needs, and putting them under the control of a massive centrally controlled behemoth that has no regard for individuals.
All brought to you by caring spcialists NDIS, NBN,Gonski Gay “marriage , “ homophobia. Islamophobia feminazism ,the victim industry, the indigenius industry , bollards ,low interest rates causing impossible debts ,,the list is endless ,they cant gelp themselves ,stupidity and incompetence is rampant they must teach it at university .
Sorry Donald I didn’t quit catch what you said, could you repeat it one more time.
Beachcomber
#3169141, posted on September 27, 2019 at 4:01 pm
But at least the Trabant was the catalyst for a great film – “Go Trabbie Go”.
I very much doubt we’ll get even that indirect type of benefit from the NBN – “Go increased p0rn download speeds go” doesn’t have quite the same ring.
RGR signed contracts. RGR don’t need to worry. Plenty of OPM.
You’d be amazed at how many believe that not enough has been spent on the NBN.
All of it.
Actually Rudd/Conroy put the NBN off-budget so I don’t think it can be funded like other govt programs. I am guessing NBNCo borrowed lots of money from banks like any start up companies would. I have seen it stated that the govt has made a contribution but I am not sure how much. Perhaps all of it but I don’t know.
There is the official costs of NBN but what about costs that can’t be measured.
For example :
$10,000 to replace phone system and alarms in a large pharmacy as original system would not work with new.
$2,000 to install new alarm in another premises.
If somebody could compile the statistics of above type examples throughout the country it would add a serious amount to the cost.
Then there is the time and disruption to business and homeowners which had installation problems.
Somebody should get a polling company to call a thousand businesss, by various types, to get an idea of NBN installation costs and delays etc.
I remember seeing a report of a speach given by Gillard after Coalition took Government. She listed three main achievements of her time as PM. Two were NBN and NDIS and can’t remember the 3rd.
I have watched these guys working in teams in the UK:
https://www.cityfibre.com/faqs/
They’re very fast and efficient – the short PR video on that page shows some of their installation teams working and is consistent with what I’ve observed in person.
This submission by CityFibre to UK regulators OFCOM is also well worth reading to see how private fibre providers work in the UK, and the regulatory interference they face in the form of price fixing etc.
There is public money involved but nothing on the scale of what has been squandered in Australia.
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/55e03fbfed915d06a4000014/CityFibre_hearing_summary_v2.pdf
Neil, I’m sure this has been covered already but it all came out of government spending, which means more national debt. This is directly out of the budget “Statement 6: Debt Statement, Assets and Liabilities” for 2019/2020:
https://www.budget.gov.au/2019-20/content/bp1/download/bp1_bs6.doc
It seems kind of weird to be extending a loan at commercial rates to a business where you are already the only equity holder … presumably the reason to do that is continuation of the pretense that this is a profitable venture.
Tel
Thanks for that. But Rudd/Conroy put NBNCo off- budget. What does that mean? I think it means it cannot be funded like other govt programs. But it looks they are funding it anyway like other govt programs.
They can be measured but they are hard to quantify.
These losses are called deadweight losses.
They are the costs of imposing a new rule or a new tax. Invariably, some production must be sacrificed, even if thew scheme is administered perfectly.
You could also chalk it up to predictable unintended consequences.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deadweight_loss
The NBN is simply the socialist wet dream come true. Not only does it waste billions of taxpayer moneys and create many overpaid no work “jobs” for leftie luvvie “progressive” public servants in a rubbish system, it ensures government controls the means of distribution of knowledge and commerce in the modern world. It’s also been an ongoing lie (fibre optics for everybody!) and a way to ensure competitive technological advancements don’t happen by being in control of their rice-bowl. It’s straight out of the backwardness of the Soviet Union. I am convinced Rudd stole the “idea” from a West Wing episode which was touting the same thing. he probably thought it was a documentary, similar to that airhead green senator thinking Sea Patrol was one too. It’s the old PMG re-invented.
My objections to the NBN are the :
1. Demise of the PSTN and replaced by a very sh1tty VOIP system.
2. Insecure HFC connections. The most hackable system in existence is provided by Telstra and Optus.
Bad enough that we are forced to pay for NBN, but we are forced (in my case) to pay for a lesser service.
It means they simply exclude those numbers from the bottom line, and report them separately.
This is nothing more than a ruse so it doesn’t look like a loss on the books … that’s it. Keeping up appearances.
In theory it goes back onto the bottom line at some stage, but you can bet it becomes the hot potato that everyone keeps finding reasons not to mention. As time goes on this will become ridiculous but it’s clownish already.
https://www.innovationaus.com/2018/06/NBN-financially-doomed-from-start
NBN Co was doomed to be a “financial disaster” regardless of whether it used Labor’s all-fibre model or the current multi-technology mix, respected independent telecommunications analyst firm New Street Research has told a joint parliamentary committee.
New Street’s respected senior analyst Ian Martin said taxpayers faced a bill for around $30 billion on write downs to the value of NBN Co under the MTM model and that the cost could have been as high as $60 billion under Labor’s all-fibre model.
NBN – devised and initiated by Rudd/Conroy, implemented by Turnbull. What can possibly go wrong?
Imagine a project designed by Turnbull then implemented by Rudd & Conroy.