Doomsdayer scientists call for genocide

The ABC, amongst others, has gone with a different angle, of course – reporting instead that 11,000 scientists have warned of the (traditionally imminent) “catastrophic threat” to humanity posed by “climate change.” The idea of neutering Africans (mainly) and sending in the abortionists is sold as “human rights.” This, they assure us, can be purchased with the contemporary left’s equivalents to the beads and mirrors of yore: “gender equity” and “education.” The goal, however, is fewer non-whites.

world population must be stabilized—and, ideally, gradually reduced … There are proven and effective policies that strengthen human rights while lowering fertility rates and lessening the impacts of population growth on GHG emissions and biodiversity loss. These policies make family-planning services available to all people, remove barriers to their access and achieve full gender equity, including primary and secondary education as a global norm for all, especially girls and young women.

The declaration was organised by well-known prepper William J. Ripple of Oregon State University. Non peer-reviewed, it is published in the journal BioScience and may be read here – along with a zipfile-accessible list of everybody who signed it. The ABC reports the signatories were “corralled” by a group called The Alliance of World Scientists – which makes them sound like sheep being harassed by a Kelpie. (The Alliance has a track record of population control zealotry and vegan advocacy). I reviewed the list and found that 2,610 of the signatories describe themselves as “student,” “researcher” or “retired.” That indicates organisers were in dire need of filler to make it that little bit more impressive. Because the statement is not peer-reviewed (by design), it follows that we cannot establish how many scientists refused to sign it. Ripple oversaw another “warning” two years ago: World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice. That in turn was an anniversary tribute to a 1992 statement by the Union of Concerned Scientists called World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity. If these people all lived together in a compound, a Democrat Attorney-General would level it with tanks.

This entry was posted in Global warming and climate change policy, Terrorism. Bookmark the permalink.

40 Responses to Doomsdayer scientists call for genocide

  1. Some History

    Towards the bottom of the journal article under “Funding”:

    The Worthy Garden Club furnished partial funding for this project.

  2. Bruce of Newcastle

    See the 11,000 Oregon climate bedwetters and raise by 32,000 Oregon realist scientists and engineers.

    Are 32,000 Scientists Enough to Question Global Warming ‘Consensus?’ (2008)

    Solomon, author of The Deniers: The World Renowned Scientists Who Stood Up Against Global Warming Hysteria, Political Persecution, and Fraud**And those who are too fearful to do so, reminds us that 32,000 scientists have now signed the “Oregon petition,” which states that

    “We urge the United States government to reject the global warming agreement that was written in Kyoto, Japan in December, 1997, and any other similar proposals. The proposed limits on greenhouse gases would harm the environment, hinder the advance of science and technology, and damage the health and welfare of mankind.

    Nothing much has been happening climatewise this century despite a 10% rise in absolute pCO2. That’s what the data I see shows anyway. I have no idea what the 11,000 are basing their views on.

  3. Some History

    The link provided in the article to sign up

    “scientistswarning dot forestry dot oregonstate dot edu”

    is unsafe. Browser produces this warning:

    Your connection is not private
    This server could not prove that it is scientistswarning.forestry.oregonstate.edu; its security certificate is from drupalweb.forestry.oregonstate.edu. This may be caused by a misconfiguration or an attacker intercepting your connection.
    NET::ERR_CERT_COMMON_NAME_INVALID
    Back to safety”

  4. feelthebern

    The ABC needs to set up a climate change War Room.
    24 hour coverage.
    7 days a week.
    Non-stop climate peril.

  5. And with the more than 1000 academics demanding a long holiday to save the planet, Christmas cheer is on its way.

  6. Rohan

    don’t encourage them feelthebern

  7. Some History

    And with the more than 1000 academics demanding a long holiday to save the planet, Christmas cheer is on its way.

    Can the planet survive the nitwits trying to Save™ all life on the planet. 🙂

  8. egg_

    The ABC needs to set up a climate change War Room.

    I thought they were the climate change War Room of the News cycle.

  9. Some History

    Towards the bottom of the journal article under “Funding”:
    The Worthy Garden Club furnished partial funding for this project.

    The Unworthy Garden Club furnished the remainder of the funding for this project.

  10. RobK

    So 11,000 students, retirees and some non specific graduates have a formula we must all live by.
    Get stuffed.

  11. Caveman

    Those pictures in the ABC article a firey sunset, house on stilts , chimney blowing steam and people superglued to ground on their asses with signs. The last photo is the scariest.

  12. Well, well, well.

    So The Holocausters have finally come out and admitted that they are…Holocausters.

    They have, of course, put the cart before the horse. Population reduction isn’t the solution to global warming, overpopulation was the problem (to them) and global warming was the pseudo-scientific fraud used to justify their attempts to quietly kill off large swathes of the globe by denying them cheap power and retarding their development whilst also crippling the developed economies who financed Third World development. Unfortunately for them China and India decided not to play ball.

    It’s not as if the Socialist vermin haven’t tried this before. Only last time it was the pseudo science of eugenics employed to ensure those deemed to be elites would all have their living space or lebensraum as it was known. We call it sustainability today. In the tiny, undeveloped mind of the socialist the world is a zero sum game. Thus fewer people means more resources for them.

    Ironic that they’re using gas again as the means to kill, only this time it’s CO2 rather than ZyklonB.

    Maybe that is what Fabian Socialist Bernard Shaw meant when he said in 1933, “I appeal to the chemists to discover a humane gas that will kill.”? CO2 is a humane gas after all.

    Ehrlich et al. were not making predictions, they were prescribing.

  13. egg_

    It’s not as if the Socialist vermin haven’t tried this before. Only last time it was the pseudo science of eugenics employed to ensure those deemed to be elites would all have their living space or lebensraum as it was known. We call it sustainability today. In the tiny, undeveloped mind of the socialist the world is a zero sum game. Thus fewer people means more resources for them.

    Sociopathic mindset – winners and losers vs growing the pie (“productivity” vs parasites).

  14. Cynic of Ayr

    Peer reviewed.
    No offense to currencylad, but anyone who thinks that “peer reviewed” these days means any slight proof of accuracy or authenticity is dreaming, or unable to read.
    Any paper espousing the urgency of Climate Change, will have hundreds or reviewers prepared to supply a tick of approval. There is no waiting, and no reading of the paper is necessary.

  15. grumpy

    The best, and indeed only, answer to any one of these out of touch numpties is “You first!”

  16. Beachcomber

    Cynic of Ayr at 1:59 pm

    Peer reviewed.
    No offense to currencylad, but anyone who thinks that “peer reviewed” these days means any slight proof of accuracy or authenticity is dreaming, or unable to read.

    Indeed. My favourite Professor of Electrical Engineering, John Brignell, summed it up very well in a post “On refeering” at his terrific website Number Watch.

    …… Peer review soon rapidly evolved from the old style refereeing to a much more sinister imposition of The Censorship. As Wegman demonstrated, new circles of like-minded propagandists formed, acting as judge and jury for each other. Above all, they acted in concert to keep out alien and hostile opinion.

  17. tgs

    Clear proof these scientists are interested in political outcomes, not evidence based scientific ones.

  18. TFX

    Co-author Australian Thomas Newsome, is a scientist with publications and expertise on dingoes. Not sure how that relates to expertise in climate science and modelling.

  19. Dr Fred Lenin

    Hitlers socialists tried to implement population reduction but werent quite as cuccessfull as their soviet compatriots under Stalin. Mao and Pol pot did their share ,and to a lesser extent NK kim and Castro tried , ,Venezuela hasnt got around to it in a big way yet ,but its early days yet I suppose these 700,ooo “scientists “ support global fascism ,another child of Marxism . Fortunately most of these concerned people dont breed. “to save the planet” there are enough deranged globalists about now .
    I say 700,p00 scientists ,its always a. Huge number ,73 doesnt sound enough .

  20. Snoopy

    If the 11,000 scientists offed themselves and their immediate families, by how much would that delay climate Armageddon? Hell, it may even reverse global warming.

    I think it’s worth trying. The Incas were very wise. Everyone knows this.

  21. Arky

    Unfortunately for them China and India decided not to play ball.

    ..
    Ever heard of the one child policy?

  22. Boambee John

    I see that around 11,000 so-called “scientists” are calling for world population to be stabilised or preferably reduced. They discreetly hint at “proven methods” to do this, but avoid details.

    The Indian and Chinese experiences make it clear that even authoritarian or totalitarian methods struggle to simply reduce population growth.

    To reduce population size in any timeframe that matches the demands of their so-called “climate emergency” will take much worse methods. As stated above, those would be the methods of Hitler, Stalin and Mao.

  23. Boambee John

    Arky

    The “one child” policy slowed the growth of population in China, it did not stop it.

    The reference to India and China, as I read it, clearly related to their attitude to Goebbels Warming and the use of fossil fuels.

  24. Ever heard of the one child policy?

    Yes. It was forced on them and funded by the West, or at least the same organisations that funded and pushed eugenics and Planned Parenthood and then the CAGW fraud.
    China have dumped the policy since they got rich BTW.
    Oh, and it only ever applied to the peasants.

  25. The reference to India and China, as I read it, clearly related to their attitude to Goebbels Warming and the use of fossil fuels.

    Yes, along with their decision to embrace free markets and that getting rich was glorious.

  26. Considering the population growth is only happening in turd world countries which seem to be heavily melanicised, doesn’t it seem a tiny, wee bit racist?
    No?
    OK.
    #EbolaforAngola.
    #ChookfluforChad
    #CholerafortheCongo

  27. #oinkfluforOman
    #MalariaforMalaya (in process)

  28. cohenite

    Strong Australian connection in this 11000 bullshit:

    https://lindenashcroft.com/

    https://thomasnewsome.com/

    This is from one of the idiot’s blog; not one of these graphs is real and yet this is being promulgated at our unis:

    https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1PCSgZjW8TY0G_m_-vClYSxxl0M7O-G621y2DfwzUWRg/edit#slide=id.p

  29. Some History

    Coming up at the Worthy Garden Club

    UPCOMING EVENTS
    ________________________________________
    Blockchains and the Future of Finance | Thursday, November 7 | 6-8:30PM | Worthy Brewing Hop Mahal
    $5 Admission (incl. 1 free beer)
    | BUY YOUR TICKET HERE
    Doctor Stephen McKeon, Associate Professor of Finance at the University of Oregon Lindquist College of Business will delve into the future of world finance and speak on the topics of Bitcoin and blockchains and how these technologies will impact financial services in the coming decades. No prior knowledge is required — the talk will begin with an overview of the technology and will then dive into use cases. Questions are encouraged! Join us at 6:00pm for a social hour. Presentation to start at 7:00pm.

    https://www.worthygardenclub.com

  30. Some History

    The propaganda does its job.

    From The Project tonight

    If 11,000 scientists don’t spur us into action on the climate emergency, what will?

  31. Beachcomber

    There is one way that has been demonstrated to reduce population growth; sometimes even putting it into negative. It is untrammelled economic growth with industrial and technological development. People in prosperous, technologically advanced societies have fewer children. In contrast, the demands of Big Climate and the doomsdayer “scientists” will cause increased population growth; which they will then use as a reason to impose totalitarian control.

  32. Bruce

    As they say in the classics, (Erma Bombeck):

    “The grass is always greener over the septic tank”.

    BUT:

    “The grass is GREENEST over the mass graves.”

  33. Russell

    I am real curious to know if anyone actually asks if “11,000 scientists” is a significant number.
    11,000 atoms don’t add up to much matter in the world.
    11,000 Asian people seems small cf. their population.
    11,000 volts is only used to supply at most about 2,000 consumers.
    The way the worldwide tertiary education system is turning out graduates with some sort of “science” qualification (include the ratbag social sciences), I’d have thought that number is just petty cash. Maybe 0.5 percent of population?
    It’s a bit like MSM saying an A380 carries 250,000 kg of fuel – like any normal media consumer has a way to calibrate that measure against their internal sizing references.
    Proper journos should be saying 11,000 scientists out of 2 million people who could call themselves a scientist (back of envelope = 40 years of 250 graduates from 200 institutions).

  34. max

    Global Warming Petition Project

    31,487 American scientists have signed this petition,
including 9,029 with PhDs

    Petition:

    We urge the United States government to reject the global warming agreement that was written in Kyoto, Japan in December, 1997, and any other similar proposals. The proposed limits on greenhouse gases would harm the environment, hinder the advance of science and technology, and damage the health and welfare of mankind.

    There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future. Cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate. Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth.

    http://www.petitionproject.org/index.php

  35. I am real curious to know if anyone actually asks if “11,000 scientists” is a significant number.

    It is entirely insignificant. It would still be insignificant if eleventy billion scientists made the claim since science is not done by consensus. If it were then the sun would orbit the Earth, smoking would be good for you and a few leeches on your bum would cure rickets.

    This is why serious scientists rarely quote the 31,000 petition posted above. It is not a vote. The number of scientists who have comprehensively and empirically proven man made global warming is precisely zero.

  36. Howard Hill

    Well I’m not exactly against the idea; however I’m sure they wouldn’t be happy with who I would get rid of first!

  37. classical_hero

    It’s a literal Mickey Mouse club. They didn’t really vet the signatories and many have degrees not related to climate.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.