Open Forum: May 30, 2015

This entry was posted in Open Forum. Bookmark the permalink.

1,267 Responses to Open Forum: May 30, 2015

  1. Cold-Hands says:

    The poor bastards at Benghazi had no chance.

    HILLARY’S TOP AIDE WITH TERROR TIES SAW ALL EMAILS

    A full review of Hillary Clinton’s personal emails released last Friday by the State Department finds Clinton’s senior aide, Huma Abedin, was exposed to highly-sensitive U.S. government information.

    It was Abedin who forwarded to Clinton’s personal email address details about the initial establishment of the U.S. special mission in Benghazi, updates about security threats to both the mission and Ambassador Chris Stevens, intelligence on the growing terrorist threat in Libya and insider information on the Sept. 11, 2012 attack in Benghazi.

    Abedin was privy to emails that contained the exact movements of Stevens while he was stationed in arguably one of the most dangerous zones in the world for any American diplomat.

    WND previously reported on Abedin’s personal and family ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and other to Islamic supremacists.

    The connections not only extend to her mother and father, who are both deeply tied to al-Qaida fronts, but to Abedin herself

  2. Dan says:

    Outstanding. Thanks Deadman

  3. srr says:

    So again, how can there be what sodomites call “marriage” “equality”, if judges don’t give rich old men permission to “marry” boys?

    And what other protections for vulnerable children, will have to be done away with, to bring about the “equality” sodomites and [email protected] demand?

    Age of consent laws

    CFCA Resource Sheet— December 2014

    https://aifs.gov.au/cfca/publications/age-consent-laws

    QLD

    Criminal Code Act 1899 (Sections 208 and 215) (link is external)

    The age of consent for anal sex (referred to as sodomy in legislation) is 18 years, and for all other sexual acts (referred to as carnal knowledge in legislation) is 16 years.

    If a person is charged with engaging in sexual activities with a person under the legal age, a legal defence is outlined in section 215(5). It states that:

    If the offence is alleged to have been committed in respect of a child of or above the age of 12 years, it is a defence to prove that the accused person believed, on reasonable grounds, that the child was of or above the age of 16 years.

    Note: This defence does not apply to acts of sodomy.

  4. srr says:

    You have to wonder about those taking up Law, who regularly verbal and libal others over subjects like Australia’s current Age of Consent Laws.

    Age of consent laws | Child Family Community Australia

    The age of consent for anal sex (referred to as sodomy in legislation) is 18 years, and for all other sexual acts (referred to as carnal knowledge in legislation) is 16 years. If a person is charged with engaging in sexual activities with a person under the legal age, a legal defence is outlined in section 215(5).

    https://aifs.gov.au/cfca/publications/age-consent-laws

  5. dover_beach says:

    If in federal law there are no marriages, but only unions, then it is feasible that all such unions are equal – thereby giving our homosexual brothers and sisters the equality they deserve. If federal law does not regulate marriage then churches can complete biblical marriages without being persecuted by militant lefties. If biblical marriage is not law then the Left can hardly complain that not baking a marriage cake, or not marrying a gay couple in a church, is discrimination.

    Bruce of N, this has all the appearance of a via media but it is, in reality, retreat and surrender. Marriage is “the union of a man and a woman to the exclusion of all others, voluntarily entered into for life.” This definition exhausts marriage, but not the types of union that a government might have a public interest in recognizing*. Moreover, if you really believed these relationships were equal, why the necessity for different names? Different things can legitimately be treated differently; if we cannot defend this simple truth than we are lost.
    *This last point is entirely lost in this debate. Has any proponent of gay ‘marriage’ ever raised and defended a purported public interest in such recognition?

  6. srr says:

    Oh, so then a dyke can ‘marry’ and have carnal knowledge with a 16 yo girl

    srr, you seem to forget that Lesbians and Sapphics take their preferred nomenclature from the supposed example of the great poetess Sappho, who (though from an island famous in antiquity for the female inhabitant’s expertise in fellatio) liked, according to some of her few surviving lyrical poems, if we interpret them autobiographically, her rather young students.

    No Deadman.

    While parents continue to take their young children out to watch loud, proud, public festivals celebrating the likes of, “Dykes On Bikes” et al, I refuse to pretend to be respectful of any of the beastly base wants and demands of that ilk.

  7. Nelson kidd-Players says:

    Thanks, Woolfe, for the Clive James link – well worth a read.

  8. Geriatric Mayfly says:

    Best gasper I ever had Dan was on top of Kilimanjaro. Oxygen 50% less than at sea level, therefore my smoky reverie lasted twice as long.

  9. . says:

    srr thinks gays don’t have sex unless they’re married?

    Now I’ve heard it all.

  10. . says:

    Mk 50 thanks for the advice.

  11. Bruce of Newcastle says:

    Best gasper I ever had Dan was on top of Kilimanjaro. Oxygen 50% less than at sea level, therefore my smoky reverie lasted twice as long.

    That is totally cool. Fascinating that a cigarette worked at that altitude. Did it taste the same?

  12. srr says:

    Premier Daniel Andrews has backed the creation of a new criminal charge for family violence offenders, saying it would send a strong message to violent men.

    An alleged family violence offender could face the same charges as someone accused of assaulting a stranger on the street, the government’s submission to the Royal Commission into Family Violence proposes.

    That would mean that if your spouse bumped into you in your shared home, they would have to prove it wasn’t deliberate … and forget yelling at the TV if the TV was dribbling the sort of shit your spouse dribbled … oh but women who have their husbands babies, their children’s siblings, violently butchered by medical professionals, they remain ‘cooler than cool’, they remain ‘heroes’ …

  13. srr says:

    . [Dot]
    #1697740, posted on June 1, 2015 at 1:14 pm

    srr thinks gays don’t have sex unless they’re married?

    Now I’ve heard it all.

    As I said –

    You have to wonder about those taking up Law, who regularly verbal and libal others over subjects like Australia’s current Age of Consent Laws.
    _____________________

    srr
    #1697632, posted on June 1, 2015 at 11:21 am

    So, this “Marriage Equality” shit; what are the specific minimum ages being pushed, if any?
    _____________________

    So again, how can there be what sodomites call “marriage” “equality”, if judges don’t give rich old men permission to “marry” boys?

    And what other protections for vulnerable children, will have to be done away with, to bring about the “equality” sodomites and [email protected] demand?

    Age of consent laws

    CFCA Resource Sheet— December 2014

    https://aifs.gov.au/cfca/publications/age-consent-laws

    QLD

    Criminal Code Act 1899 (Sections 208 and 215) (link is external)

    The age of consent for anal sex (referred to as sodomy in legislation) is 18 years, and for all other sexual acts (referred to as carnal knowledge in legislation) is 16 years.

    If a person is charged with engaging in sexual activities with a person under the legal age, a legal defence is outlined in section 215(5). It states that:

    If the offence is alleged to have been committed in respect of a child of or above the age of 12 years, it is a defence to prove that the accused person believed, on reasonable grounds, that the child was of or above the age of 16 years.

    Note: This defence does not apply to acts of sodomy.

    .[Dot]
    #1697655, posted on June 1, 2015 at 11:53 am

    Oh, so then a dyke can ‘marry’ and have carnal knowledge with a 16 yo girl, but poofs still have to wait for their toy boys to become men.

    Gee, surely the “equality” mobs will have to change those laws to, won’t they.

    They should. There is also no such thing as carnal knowledge.

    Do you realise how strict the rules are on getting permission to marry early?

    Yes, not that strict, and I also know that any state that brags about psychologically and medically perverting the gender of children as young as 7, will find removing age of consent laws, a cakewalk, because hell, if a 7 year old girl or boy can “consent” to being medically prevented from maturing into a young man or young lady, then how the hell can anyone deny them “consenting” to being a sex toy?

  14. . says:

    Yes, not that strict

    Bullshit.

    Yes they are indeed strict. Only one party may be aged 16-18. The other party must be over 18.

    Must be proven to a judicial officer:

    – Parental permission (waived if an affidavit proving unreasonableness or incapacity can be produced)
    – Proof of voluntariness
    – Evidence of maturity
    – Length of relationship
    – Finances
    – Independence as a couple

    Pregnancy is not automatic. A judicial officer must find the circumstances are exceptional. It is only valid for three months.

  15. . says:

    “There is no offence such as carnal knowledge anymore”

    In NSW, there is no such thing at all.

  16. Lots of other countries have lost their marbles, so should we.

    If it’s good enough for the Irish to eat shit, then it’s good enough for us, eh Bill? Conformism now!!

Comments are closed.