Don’t tell us how to live. Don’t tell us our lives are inferior to yours. Don’t take away our livelihoods. Don’t patronise and belittle us, then expect us to vote for you.
Liberty Quote
To lay with one hand the power of the government on the property of the citizen, and with the other to bestow it upon favored individuals to aid private enterprises and build up private fortunes, is none the less a robbery because it is done under the forms of law and is called taxation.
— Samuel F. MillerRecent Comments
- Salvatore, Social Distance Martyr on Open Forum: January 16, 2021
- Snoopy on Open Forum: January 16, 2021
- Salvatore, Social Distance Martyr on Open Forum: January 16, 2021
- Zulu Kilo Two Alpha on Open Forum: January 16, 2021
- Whalehunt Fun on PDT farewell address
- Snoopy on US post-election thread IX: We got so tired of winning that we stopped winning
- mh on US post-election thread IX: We got so tired of winning that we stopped winning
- Snoopy on US post-election thread IX: We got so tired of winning that we stopped winning
- Snoopy on US post-election thread IX: We got so tired of winning that we stopped winning
- m0nty on US post-election thread IX: We got so tired of winning that we stopped winning
- m0nty on US post-election thread IX: We got so tired of winning that we stopped winning
- John Smith101 on US post-election thread IX: We got so tired of winning that we stopped winning
- m0nty on US post-election thread IX: We got so tired of winning that we stopped winning
- candy on US post-election thread IX: We got so tired of winning that we stopped winning
- Salvatore, Social Distance Martyr on Open Forum: January 16, 2021
- MatrixTransform on Open Forum: January 16, 2021
- John Smith101 on US post-election thread IX: We got so tired of winning that we stopped winning
- Indolent on US post-election thread IX: We got so tired of winning that we stopped winning
- Knuckle Dragger on Open Forum: January 16, 2021
- Steve trickler on Open Forum: January 16, 2021
- m0nty on US post-election thread IX: We got so tired of winning that we stopped winning
- Ozman on PDT farewell address
- Tailgunner on US post-election thread IX: We got so tired of winning that we stopped winning
- Geriatric Mayfly on Open Forum: January 16, 2021
- Salvatore, Social Distance Martyr on Open Forum: January 16, 2021
- grazza on PDT farewell address
- JC on Open Forum: January 16, 2021
- Knuckle Dragger on Open Forum: January 16, 2021
- Zulu Kilo Two Alpha on Open Forum: January 16, 2021
- Salvatore, Social Distance Martyr on Open Forum: January 16, 2021
-
Recent Posts
- Cultural decline: Inaugural festivities then and now
- PDT farewell address
- 2020: Chuck Schumer urges mob to kill Supreme Court judges
- Incitement?
- 1776 Commission
- It’s Martin Luther King Jr Day in the United States
- Popular Joe
- Two views on the green energy transition in Germany
- What’s united about the United States?
- US post-election thread IX: We got so tired of winning that we stopped winning
- Corrupt cops may have been using a second snitch lawyer
- Democrat extremists now have a green light from Biden Junta
- CIS Annual Report for 2020
- Get ready for some hard-hitting accountability journalism
- “Harming people in the name of helping them is one of mankind’s favourite pastimes”
- The Insider Assassination Hoax
- The empire strikes back with a wet lettuce leaf
- Promoting “hatred, division and madness”
- Australia’s Nazi community deserves an apology
- Trump’s loss: the treason of the intellectuals
- Most COVID fines to be dropped
- Phil Spector 1939 – 2021
- Trust The Science
- Read this book
- Latest on their ABC
- Vive la résistance
- Jo Nova on impending declassification of Obamagate documents
- Mark Mills and the reality of the Green New Deal
- Incited by Nancy Pelosi, Democrat terrorists tried to kill Trump
- Open Forum: January 16, 2021
Archives
Pages
Blogroll
- 38 South
- ABC The Drum
- AEI Ideas
- Alex
- all right, all right
- Andrew Bolt
- Andrew McIntyre
- Andrew Norton – New
- Andrew Norton – Old
- Arnold Kling
- Aussie Macro Moments
- Becker – Posner
- Bill Mitchell – billy blog
- Bob McGee
- Cafe Hayek
- Calculated Risk
- Calling Bullshit
- Captain Capitalism
- Carpe Diem (New)
- Carpe Diem (Old)
- Causes of the crisis
- Chalk Bunny
- Charles Richardson
- Chicago University – Pro Market
- Chris Snowdon
- Club Troppo
- Confessions of a College Professor
- Consumer Choice Center
- Continental Telegraph
- Conversable Economist
- Coordination Problem
- Core Economics
- Cryptoeconomics
- Dan Wang
- Daniel Greenfield
- David Hart
- Diane Coyle
- Dick Puddlecote
- Econ Journal Watch
- EconAcademics
- Econbrowser
- EconLog
- Econofact
- Econometrics Beat
- Economic Education Initiative
- Essential Hayek
- Fama/French
- Fault Lines
- Fiscal Times
- Foundation for Economic Education
- Freedom and Prosperity Academy
- Greg Mankiw
- Grey Enlightenment
- Guido Fawkes
- Harry Clarke (Temporary)
- Head Rambles
- Homer Paxton
- How does your MP vote
- Institutional Economics
- International Liberty
- Islam and Liberty Network
- Jim Rose
- John Cochrane
- John Lott
- John Quiggin
- John Taylor
- Journal of Economic Perspectives
- Julie Borowski
- Keith Hennessey
- Legal Insurrection
- Liberty Law Blog
- Liberty Works
- Loaded Dogma
- Macrobusiness
- Mannkal Foundation
- Marginal Revolution
- Marius Kloppers
- Mark the Ballot
- Mark the Graph
- markedlymacrotoo
- Market Urbanism
- Master Resource
- Matt Ridley
- Menzies House
- Michael Oakeshott Association
- Michael Smith
- Michel Rauchs
- Miranda Devine
- Money Illusion
- MyGovCost
- Natural Order – Christopher Lingle
- New Economist
- Notes on Liberty
- Offsetting Behaviour
- Oliver Hartwich
- On Line Opinion
- Opinion Dominion
- Paul Johnson Archives
- Peter Fenwick
- Peter Martin
- Philippa Martyr
- Piled Higher and Deeper
- Pointman
- Political Calculations
- Potemkin's Village
- Poverty Cure
- Prick with a fork
- Principles of Forecasting
- Quadrant Online
- Queensland Economy Watch
- Quillette
- Raph Koster
- Reflections on Liberty and Power
- Retraction Watch
- Rhino economics
- ricardian ambivalence
- Robert Murphy
- Roger Kerr (archive)
- Rosemary Fryth
- Skepticlawyer
- Sound Money
- Spiked
- Sports Economist
- Statista
- Stop Gillard's Carbon Tax
- Streetwise Professor
- Stubborn Mule
- Taking Liberties (Simon Clark)
- Tax Foundation
- Tax Rambling
- TaxProf
- The Baseline Scenario
- The Black Steam Train
- The Marcus Review
- The Moronic Lodge
- The TaxPayers' Alliance
- The Visible Hand
- The Wentworth Report
- Think Markets
- Thomas the Think Engine
- Tim Blair
- Tim Worstall
- Truth on the Market
- Vox CEPR Policy Portal
- William Briggs – Statistician
Meta
Yes! But GS was part of the problem.
Greg Sheridan defended his statement following Trump’s thumping victory by using the Philip Adams excuse – that he didn’t realise the American people were that low, or words to that effect.
When did he see the light?
I read that the Chinese Government was hoping to reset relations with the new government.
Funny how they like multi-party democracies- in OTHER countries!
GS just bum crawling.
How the fark none of these commentators ever challenged the most fukd Labor policies ever during the election. No accountability , Labor has been exposed as the fukn rabble it is and they were going to unleash their economic utopia on us. They in the wilderness for the next 10 years.
On electoral outcomes the left typically claims that right-wing voters have been deluded into voting against their own interests by supporting a capitalist industrial captains class who will only exploit them.
After the election is over and the issue of policy change (in welfare, health, education etc) arises, the left typically claim that right-wingers are just plain evil.
So is the right wing evil or deluded? Surely we can’t be both. Because anyone who honestly thinks they’re doing the right thing for the world is not evil. Anyone who is evil in their intentions can only be effectively evil by holding an accurate model of how the world works, so is not deluded. Could the left get their story straight please?
Flipping the argument around…
There are some people who have personality types, through no fault of their own, that leaves them unable to deal with criticism and very reluctant to compete with others. They’d rather take orders than take risks. Such personality types are going to be naturally drawn to the Socialist doctrine as the politics most likely to make a world they can thrive in. For argument’s sake let’s call them the Type S personalities. I would only be guessing what fraction of the population that is, maybe 15% or 20% based on Greens votes, but don’t know where to look it up. Jonathon Haidt’s research on the relationship between moral reasoning and political membership found 74% of respondents were members of the Progressive ilk (American ‘liberals’). He also found:
We shouldn’t be telling Type S how to live, that their personalities are inferior to ours, taking away their unelected central planning jobs, and patronising and belittling them, and then expecting them to vote for our politicians. It works both ways.
The problem is one of diversity at a very fundamental level, and how the whole society can keep ticking along when it is made of such different building blocks. (D’oh, looks like I just systematised.) If you define evil as “not caring about others” then libertarians and conservatives are the most evil. If you define evil as “using force to remove comparative advantage” then the Progressives are the most evil. We disagree on good and evil at the level of personality type, way before we get to any political ideology or political party. It is no wonder politics was a taboo subject in polite society. Yet the problem remains of how we can all get along.
Indeed, they are all the same. First year in J-School they drill holes in their head, the balance of schooling is just the refilling process. Can’t graduate unless your brains and reasoning have gone.
When did he see the light?
About 7.00AM on Sunday morning, I should think.
As asked over at “Small Dead Animals”: http://www.smalldeadanimals.com/index.php/2019/05/20/whats-the-difference-between-the-eu-and-the-borg/
What’s the difference between the EU and The Borg?
One of the better responses:
“One is a vicious predatory group linked into a single collective which has the ultimate goal of achieving its idea of perfection by assimilating all other life forms, regardless of cost. The other is a fictional alien group on Star Trek.”
So, how are we traveling in the Antipodes?
If you define evil as “not caring about others” then libertarians and conservatives are the most evil.
I don’t agree with this part of an otherwise insightful posting, Colonel.
Conservatives do care about others. For example they care about potential victims of terrorism (who ‘progressives’ couldn’t give a shit about, unless they’re Mvsl!ms, because ‘diversity’) and potential victims of random king hits by ice heads (who libertarians couldn’t give a shit about because ‘freedom’).
Conservatives do, however, expect people to accept constraints necessary for the welfare of others and to take responsibility for the consequences of their own actions, which means that conservatives often don’t do indulgent “but they want to!” like libertarians or fluffy mollycoddling ‘tolerance’ like ‘progressives’.
That’s not lack of ‘caring’, that’s just an understanding that ‘caring’ isn’t always manifested by licence and indulgence.
If you define evil as “not caring about others” then libertarians and conservatives are the most evil.
And yet the most murderous political types have been Socialists of one stripe or another.
Why is that so?
Because, despite their pretence of caring for others, their philosophy makes the individual a means to an end and therefore dispensable for the cause.
Always beware of those who claim to love humankind; it’s usually only in the abstract.
Yes well spotted there, Tim. That remark by Haidt was only about libertarians, but I lumped them in with conservatives. Revising my statement to match the real survey data then…
If you define evil as believing that might makes right, valuing purity over heterogeneity, and giving more favours and help to cronies and family members than to needy strangers, then conservatives are evil. That’s the preference of conservatives and is unsurprisingly a recurring criticism by lefties.
You can watch a presentation about this on youtube “The moral roots of liberals and conservatives – Jonathan Haidt”, the most relevant portion is about 11 minutes long starting at 5:27
https://youtu.be/8SOQduoLgRw?t=327
Very interesting stuff. I’ve begun to see political ideologies not just as morality clubs, which is all that Haidts research supports, but furthermore as personality unionism.
I imagine how terrible the world would become if we literally shipped all the Type S off to their own island, and all the ESFJs and conservatives lived in their own country, and all the INTPs in their own country. The ESFJ personalities would launch a world war and take over everyone else. This doesn’t happen because they are spread around the world, disjoint, and surrounded with other personality types. Phew! But if this present multi-personalityism is the best solution for preventing different personality types from unionising and escalating into violence… well what would therefore be the solution for preventing different cultures from going to war? Yes, exactly. So if multiculturalism is so terrible, what alternative solution are conservatives going to put in place that hasn’t already demonstrably failed? Or flipping it around, if we can already tolerate different personalities intermixing, can we not tolerate everyday friction between imported cultures by the same mental and behavioural tricks?
I don’t know the answer, but would never have thought of asking the question if I hadn’t seen that video.
I don’t know about ‘conservatives’ but Christians are the most generous when it comes to charitable giving
Flies in the face of the lefty narrative.
A worthy Liberty Quote! Well done Mr Sheridan.
Greg doesn’t always get it, but he has this time.
Greg Sheridan – the Catholic case homosexual marriage.
I like River Tam’s version
While it is true River is fictional, Summer Glau is much better looking than Sheridan.