John Roskam on media hypocrisy

Posted on 9:09 am, October 22, 2019 by Sinclair Davidson

This entry was posted in Media, Sink the Fink. Bookmark the permalink.

14 Responses to John Roskam on media hypocrisy

  2. the sting
    #3190650, posted on October 22, 2019 at 9:19 am

    When the media keeps the truth from you , what are they covering up ?

  3. Roger
    #3190651, posted on October 22, 2019 at 9:19 am

    Free speech for me but not for thee, deplorables!

  4. stackja
    #3190658, posted on October 22, 2019 at 9:23 am

    MSM be consistent? Unlikely.

  5. John64
    #3190676, posted on October 22, 2019 at 9:44 am

    I thought Roskam was excellent with Blot last night – really nailed it.

    Unbelievable that TheirABC and The Liars who fully supported the Nuclear Milkman’s (ultimately failed) attempt to crack down on the “hate media” back in 2012 are now bleating about press freedom. Then again, it’s not unbelievable knowing the sort of left wing scum we are dealing with.

  6. OldOzzie
    #3190684, posted on October 22, 2019 at 10:06 am

    Steve Hilton Fox News: Impeachment is partisan politics dressed up as principle

    Good 8 min 37 sec youtube video summary

    Steve says that impeachment is about partisan politics for the Democrats and defeating populism for the ruling class.

  8. Ivan Denisovich
    #3190712, posted on October 22, 2019 at 10:57 am

    If the Appeasement Party MPs weren’t such appeasers, this would be an ideal opportunity to to present a bill repealing 18C. Imagine how the msm would squirm over that.

  9. jupes
    #3190729, posted on October 22, 2019 at 11:40 am

    Excellent appearance by Roskam.

    Also note that Bolta has two articles banned by law because of their “tone”.

  10. cohenite
    #3190735, posted on October 22, 2019 at 11:48 am

    I’m having less and less sympathy for the non-left; the left scum have played this beautifully: they’re disciplined and tribalized and have their minions in control in the msm, academia/schools, bureaucracy, politics and even business.

    Until the non-left wake up and start playing it as hard as the scabs of the left they’re going to lose. The only reason Trump is winning is because he returns fire from the left with fire and calls the arseholes of the left arseholes. But even he will lose unless he puts orange suits on some of the bastards.

  11. Cassie of Sydney
    #3190799, posted on October 22, 2019 at 12:55 pm

    “cohenite
    #3190735, posted on October 22, 2019 at 11:48 am”

    Agree Cohenite.

  12. Howard Hill
    #3190805, posted on October 22, 2019 at 1:01 pm

    Only hypocrisy? They’re down right fucking evil. All they really want is to be able to say and do what they like at their choosing which is nothing of use to us plebs. The print media is dying fast and they’re shitting themselves. The TV news is a complete fucking joke.
    Thirty minutes of news gets broken down to fifteen minutes of ads, five minutes of weather, eight minutes of sport and one minute of Trump derangement syndrome. That leaves one minute to tell us a couple of whopping lies. I guess it could be worse and could be twenty minutes of whopping lies.
    I wonder how much support they’ll get from the public in this situation, not much I bet and they’ll be wondering why?

    And Bolt is no better. He’s not really out there exposing anything that his fellow comrades are up to and when they talk about what the state has forbidden them from talking about, what do you hear from any of them? Crickets!

  13. Phill
    #3190824, posted on October 22, 2019 at 1:19 pm

    I would be looking for a MSM commitment to several points before I would support their position;
    1. A demonstrated record of investigating and publishing malfeasance where it is damaging to their own side of politics.
    2. A willingness provide the correct facts and context for each story.
    3. A commitment to protect material that is classified in line with the Government Protective Security Policy Framework.
    4. A commitment to having their people formally cleared to handle classified material.
    5. A recognition that the process of classification is in fact a public interest test.
    6. A commitment to not nag, meddle, or try to correct wrongthink in their paying customers.
    7. A commitment to spell correctly.

    Any others I should add to the list?

  14. Colonel Crispin Berka
    #3190908, posted on October 22, 2019 at 2:29 pm

    What free speech advocates are trying to do with the media today is the equivalent of shouting “theatre” in a crowded fire – and getting burned for it.

Comments are closed.