Mike O’Ceirin. Just do it! Replace coal with RE. Why not?

How often have you heard that? I have heard it many times from people in various walks of life but principally from environmental activists. They speak as if this is a simple thing to do and we only need the will to do it. When the reliability is put forward as a problem they say we just need enough storage.

Will storage work? How much do we need? That depends on the amount of variability and how do we measure that? A useful tool for this is the Capacity Factor that is calculated on an hourly basis as a fraction of the energy dispatched in the hour compared with the theoretical maximum (the plated or installed capacity) on the grid.

Looking at the whole of 2018 the average Capacity Factor of the wind supply was 29% based on the maximum plate capacity connected to the eastern grid (5342 MW) and the hourly average of 1549MW of dispatched wind power.

In a system where continuity of supply is a critical consideration we need to look at the variability and not just the average. Could the capacity approach zero? What do we find using a figure of 2%  that is just about zero?

The AEMO data for 2018 and 2019 shows that it happened nine times in the last two years and there are many more instances over the last seven years.

The figures are for five-minute intervals. So for a period at 1pm on October 29 last year the whole wind fleet contributed 136MW compared with the average of 1950MW  for the year.

At the time there were 55 wind power stations spread from Queensland to Tasmania and South Australia. This is an exceptionally large area and a large investment in wind infrastructure but only 136 MWh could be dispatched! When considered along with the performance of other  sources this is even more significant as the chart below demonstrates.

This shows a particular outage,  any will do and the one selected is  09/06/2018. The chart covers 16 hours starting at 4pm. Clearly black coal and brown coal dominate with gas and hydro ramping up to meet the evening peak.

Over the period a total of 344 GWh of power was delivered and RE supplied 49 GWh.  Hydro is usually regarded as a form of RE and that provided 42 GWh with wind and solar tipping in 7 GWh. There was even a period of three hours when there was no electricity from wind and solar. The other providers and barely visible.

The only reliable form of RE at the moment is hydroelectricity as the chart shows but we have not built any new dams for many decades, principally because of pressure from environmentalists. They don’t like dams and the foundation of the Greens party was the activist effort to stop the building of the Franklin in Tasmania. While this environmentalist thinking is in force hydroelectricity does not have a future.

If you ask the environmentalists they will tell you that the spells when there is little or no wind and solar can be overcome by storage. You know, batteries and pumped  hydro!

Many think that large grid scale batteries will do the trick, like the one in South Australia, is that possible? The findings of this outage can be applied to a hypothetical wind power station, of 200 MW. Over 16 hours, operating at the average capacity of 29% that would generate 928 MWh. Compare that with the capacity of the 150MW Tesla battery, it is not in the race to  bridge the gap. And that is for a single wind farm. Sure, it might be useful for other things like charging with cheap electricity and selling it at a premium price (“ getting our money back!”), but it certainly it is not going to decrease the price of electricity. Or maintain continuity of supply

So, will the proposed Snowy Mountains 2.0 have enough capacity?

Computer modelling indicates that could just about work to stabilise the current wind power station infrastructure There are many ifs and buts in the model but let’s say it all works. The result would be a renewable energy supply to replace one 2 GW coal-fired power station. Cost about $21 billion and all the wind turbines to be replaced every 15 years or so at a cost of about $16 billion. Who thinks that will happen and that the current infrastructure will be expanded so that fossil fuels are replaced? Just find the sites and the money to build nine more Snowy2.0 to follow the first!

The data to support this article comes from the AEMO, it publishes in five minute increments the amount of energy dispatched to the eastern grid from all the generators attached to it. Each wind farm is counted as a unit and the multiple generators in the coal-fired power stations are counted individually. See the lists at the bottom of the tables for the separate power sources at the Anero site.

Mike O’Ceirin analyst/programmer retired.

South Australia today. The Wind Power State

This entry was posted in Global warming and climate change policy, Guest Post. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Mike O’Ceirin. Just do it! Replace coal with RE. Why not?

  1. Sinclair Davidson

    Rafe – Please put the author’s name up at the top.

  2. Mullumhillbilly

    The simplest response is “you first”

  3. Cardimona

    Thanks for this article, Rafe.

    Because I see the term “wind farm” as a form of subliminal programming (good things come from farms, right?) I prefer to call these industrial installations, “wind-energy factories”.
    I reckon the phrase “wind energy” reminds the reader that they rely on the fickle breeze, and the word “factory” implies a large, ugly, damaging, and polluting structure.
    Which they are.

    Calm days when the local wind energy factory is becalmed often inspire me to fire off a missive to the area’s newspapers, to remind people of the pointlessness of relying on wind to power society.
    Here’s one from last week – which so far hasn’t had a run.
    On the bright side, a journo on letters desk had to read it, hopefully triggering some cognitive dissonance.

    The Editor

    Not much wind on the Tablelands at lunchtime on Thursday. Let’s see how our local monuments to the greenie religion were doing.

    I opened https://anero.id/energy/wind-energy, scrolled to “Today’s Wind Energy Production”, deselected everything except MEWF1 (Mt Emerald Wind Farm), and chose “%”, and then chose “MW”.

    These showed MEWF1 was producing zero per cent of its potential output and zero electricity, and had been since 11:15am. It was powering zero homes.

    The previous 24 hours showed it had produced a maximum of 83.6 megawatts for a brief moment at 10:15pm Wednesday.

    If it had kept that up it could have powered 77,407 homes. But it didn’t, because it couldn’t.

    But somehow our political class (CP, 28/4) think it’s worth building more of these useless things? We’re led by idiots

    (129 words)

    I also sent this a few days earlier, but it hasn’t had a run either.
    Meh, the scattergun approach can be useful.

    The Editor

    Would a race driver take to the track knowing his fuel-pump was faulty? Would a long-haul truckie hit the highway knowing his fuel-pump could stop and start without notice?

    Coal-fired and nuclear power-plants don’t have fuel-pump problems; their fuel is on tap as required without fail.

    You know what does have a fuel supply problem? Windmills do. Wind is their fuel supply and it can stop and start without notice.

    Australian high-pressure systems can cause our entire windmill fleet to hit their choke point simultaneously, going from producing 80% of their “nameplate capacity” to just 2% in minutes.

    Why would we rely on generators with faulty fuel-pumps in our electricity supply? If our politicians had any brains at all they’d cancel the new faulty generators at Kaban (CP, 28/4).

    The last thing we need when repairing our wrecked economy is faulty electricity generators that drive power prices up.

    (148 words)

Comments are closed.