Cap wearer had it coming

“WE got a Trumper right here,” can be heard clearly in the video just prior to a Democrat terrorist (who also appears to have a machete strapped to his waste) summarily murder a lone-walking young man in cold blood on a Portland footpath. Using AP copy, the ABC regards it as an even “clash”:

 
There follows a completely invented narrative – total lies – about the murder possibly being a reaction to a pro-Trump “caravan” of vehicles that drove through the area 15 minutes earlier. The number one “key point” at the ABC report is that the victim was wearing a “Patriot Prayer” cap.

 
Democrats and the media incited every one of these killings – not because of outrage surrounding the death of violent moron George Floyd but to Get Trump and terrorise those contemplating his re-election.

This entry was posted in Media, Politics of the Left, Terrorism. Bookmark the permalink.

24 Responses to Cap wearer had it coming

  1. Buccaneer

    Vandalism, looting, assault and murder is terrorism

  2. flyingduk

    Shot in the chest ….. Police not able to protect him, Yet in this country, body armour is illegal for private citizens. I wonder why that might be, i wonder who might benefit?

  3. Rob MW

    I’m not sure that the Marxists understand what being progressive actually is. Even the wild west had rules about shooting unarmed conservatives, in fact, the unarmed were usually given a gun/knife/whatever to protect the self defense/fair fight defense. Marxist cowards don’t need no fucking rules in the 2ist century, progress, is to fall back to be a fucking Neanderthal.

  4. candy

    “We got a Trumper right here,”

    Apart from the grief of the family, this murder is very chilling. If Trump comes back and wins, many very terrible things could happen, let alone leading up to the election.

    In one sense, I wonder if he thinks to himself should he go through with the election, since the BLM are going to kill his supporters in an attempt to terrorise Americans into not voting for Trump. He’s a good man and may feel some worries.

  5. Annie

    @Candy. It would be giving in to the bullies for the POTUS to decide to stand down as candidate. The answer is proper policing at demonstrations. The situation is appalling in the Democrat areas.

  6. H B Bear

    Trump caps are the new Confederate flags for Civil War 2.0.

  7. H B Bear

    Coming soon to a city near you.

  8. Roger

    Democrats and the media incited every one of these killings – not because of outrage surrounding the death of violent moron George Floyd but to Get Trump and terrorise those contemplating his re-election.

    Meanwhile, polls reported a rise in support for Trump among blacks and Hispanics during the RNC.

    How’s that strategy working out for ya, Dimocrats?

  9. rickw

    There is a comprehensive propaganda campaign in play.

    Australian MSM is completely implicit in this.

    Turn off Big Brother.

    Turn off your Televisions.

  10. Dr Faustus

    The Mayor of Portland tells it:

    ‘It’s you who have created the hate’: Portland mayor slams Donald Trump after deadly unrest

    “President Trump, for four years, we’ve had to live with you and your racist attacks on black people,” Mr Wheeler told a press conference.

    “We learned early about your sexist attitudes towards women. We’ve had to endure clips of you mocking a disabled man. We’ve had to listen to your anti-democratic attacks on journalists … We’ve listened to your attacks on immigrants. We’ve listened to you label Mexicans ‘rapists’.

    So not actually a tribute to the late Fentanyl Man.
    Just politics by mother means.
    #democratcareersmatter

  11. Natural Instinct

    The ABC is pushing hard the CNN narrative that those opposing the existing rioters are “Trump supporters”.

    Donald Trump supporters clash with Black Lives Matter protesters in Portland, one killed

    Why not then say rioters are “Biden supporters” just as prominently, and BLM and Antifa tags second?

  12. billie

    It would be giving in to the bullies

    meh, we give in to intolerent bullies all the time in victoria

    vic police not only give in to bullies, they help them victimise anyone coming here who might have protests against them

    how many states allowed blm protests?

  13. cuckoo

    Using AP copy, the ABC regards it an even “clash”

    Just as, when they reported Rand Paul and others leaving the RNC conference being surrounded by deranged, violently obscene, physically intimidating thugs, the ABC described this as an even-sided “encounter”. And were careful not to show the readily available video of the incident.

  14. Geoff Cruickshank

    ABC..” murder possibly being a reaction to a pro-Trump “caravan” of vehicles that drove through the area 15 minutes earlier. ”

    Oh sure, that makes it OK then.
    Leftsplaining.

  15. Arnost

    since the BLM are going to kill his supporters in an attempt to terrorise Americans into not voting for Trump

    Agree. The threat to in person voters is not insignificant. I can visualise a scenario where 90% of Trump voters would go and vote in person. This scenario will set up the possibility that the mail votes may not yet arrive or be challenged, and so give Trump a clear “win” on the night (possibly forcing a concession if the win is significant).

    I think the Dems game plan (given with Biden and Harris as candidates they are in effect conceding the election already) to use a challenged / suspect mail to somehow deligitimise a Trump presidency over the coming 4 years. However, if it is just Dems mailing in then these votes can be challenged (and we have precedent where 10’s of thousands are being disallowed) and that favours Trump where only the Dems votes can decrease.

    https://nypost.com/2020/08/05/84000-mail-in-ballots-disqualified-in-nyc-primary-election/

    So for the election to be delegitimiseable, they need the vote to be close and so need Trump voters to mail in votes too [to similarly challenge and disqualify their votes]. And the buildup in the threat of, and the actual violence against Trump voters is – quite possibly – a means to keep them away from the voting booths, and mail in.

    A cynical assessment would be that in the Red states – where there are no rioting / ANTIFA issues – there will be no voting issues. It will only be the metro city areas in Blue states (where over 90% will vote Dem in any event) that burn and have the violence, and so further encourage the red / rural areas … where in person voting can be done safely… to vote Trump in larger numbers.

  16. miltonf

    The ABC is an abomination beyond reform. A bloated playgroup of spoiled second and third generation marxists on obscenely high salaries which they try to keep secret.

  17. miltonf

    An expensive, taxpayer funded abomination beyond reform.

  18. Slim Cognito

    The election should be delayed until the Dems admit they lost the last one. They still refuse to accept the result 4 years later.

  19. miltonf

    Yes, the foul old Clinton slag’s been mouthing off again.

  20. Elizabeth (Lizzie) Beare

    The mainstream media with few exceptions have been a disgrace during the Trump Presidency. They have overblown trivia, claimed racism where there was none, have regularly reported incorrectly completely out of context, fabricated so-called ‘lies’ that Trump never told, ‘fact checked’ with blatant bias and omitted reporting on Trump’s many successes. The result has been a massive groupthink of hatred and derangement towards this President in the Nation, ably assisted by the Marxists across the educational systems.

    Top it off with Democrat attempts from the day of Trump’s election to de-legitimise his Presidency with continual baseless lawfare and there is a perfect storm.

    Candy, this storm has to be ridden and defeated, there is no other path for a decent America. Toss in the towel on it and it will only become bolder, and worse.

    Communism is like that, and relies on its ‘useful idiots’. No-one with any sense of history, and that is not today’s Democrats, seeing the US today, could ever think communism and its soothing mask of socialism provides anything but thuggery and decay. The Democrats have drunk their own Kool-Aid.

  21. Kneel

    “Trump caps are the new Confederate Union flags for Civil War 2.0.”

    FIFY.

    “Meanwhile, polls reported a rise in support for Trump among blacks and Hispanics during the RNC.”

    Yeah – check the “swing states”, they are not only the ones that control the outcome, they are the ones with the biggest swings to Trump.

    “So for the election to be delegitimiseable, …”
    Here’s the way Dems plan to steal the election.
    Cases about mail-in votes – if these aren’t settled by (this time around) Dec 8th, the state legislature can direct the college electors to vote as that house decides, as long as they are ready to go by 14th Dec – not ready, lose your vote.
    However, the one loophole that they will exploit is this: what happens if a state sends multiple electors to congress, each disagreeing with the other over who won? How can congress decide? Tricky. If they make it controversial enough, it may come down to a choice by the speaker of the house – gee, I wonder who Nancy would want as POTUS?
    So watch for that – no concession, confusion, big controversy, follow the rules, Nancy decides, Joe gets in.
    Dems (at least Hillbillary) have already said “don’t concede” – that’s why. Remember that these dates are “fixed” – they vary in actual date by year, but the timing is fixed. Popular election takes place Tuesday after the first Monday in Nov, college election takes place, umm, second Monday in Dec (??), State challenges settled by 6 days before college election, inauguration by Jan 20th.

  22. Zatara

    I think the Dems game plan (given with Biden and Harris as candidates they are in effect conceding the election already) to use a challenged / suspect mail to somehow deligitimise a Trump presidency over the coming 4 years.

    Unquestionably. I mean they’ve been doing it since 2016, why stop now?

    And the buildup in the threat of, and the actual violence against Trump voters is – quite possibly – a means to keep them away from the voting booths, and mail in.

    IMO that one would backfire big time. A threat to the polls/voters would get ugly quickly and the mood would turn even more against the instigating party. Nobody in their right mind doubts which party that would be.

    what happens if a state sends multiple electors to congress, each disagreeing with the other over who won?

    Following the nationwide presidential election day, on the Tuesday after the first Monday of November, each state counts its popular votes according to that state’s laws to designate presidential electors. In forty-eight states and D.C., the winner of the plurality of the statewide vote receives all of that state’s electors; in Maine and Nebraska, two electors are assigned in this manner and the remaining electors are allocated based on the plurality of votes in each congressional district.

    Each state’s electors meet in their respective state capital on the first Monday after the second Wednesday of December to cast their votes. The results are counted by Congress, where they are tabulated in the first week of January before a joint meeting of the Senate and House of Representatives, presided over by the vice president, as president of the Senate. Should a majority of votes not be cast for a candidate, the House turns itself into a presidential election session, where one vote is assigned to each of the fifty states. The elected president and vice president are inaugurated on January 20.

  23. Kneel

    ” In forty-eight states and D.C., the winner of the plurality of the statewide vote receives all of that state’s electors…”

    I believe several states now have legislation that states the electoral college votes go to the winner of the popular vote nation wide. CA maybe? Maybe others?

    “The results are counted by Congress, where they are tabulated in the first week of January before a joint meeting of the Senate and House of Representatives, presided over by the vice president, as president of the Senate.”

    Indeed – as I said, what happens if more than one set of electors show up? One sent by the Governor, one by the state house, eg, in opposition to each other. This is, I believe, an “undocumented” possibility, and so it is up the Congress to sort it out. As I understand it, if Congress can’t or won’t do it by the proscribed date, the Speaker of the House appoints the President.

Comments are closed.