Archbishop bars male priest from ministry because he’s now a ‘she’ and that means ‘her’ 28-year marriage (to a woman) is now ‘same sex’ and the archbishop can’t recognise that as authentic even though the ‘woman’ insists ‘she’ and ‘her’ wife are not gay

This entry was posted in Cultural Issues, Ethics and morality. Bookmark the permalink.

34 Responses to Archbishop bars male priest from ministry because he’s now a ‘she’ and that means ‘her’ 28-year marriage (to a woman) is now ‘same sex’ and the archbishop can’t recognise that as authentic even though the ‘woman’ insists ‘she’ and ‘her’ wife are not gay

  1. stackja says:

    Yes! The inmates now running the asylum.

  2. H B Bear says:

    The only way this could be more Adelaide was if it was dismembered in a barrel.

  3. Old School Conservative says:

    That story is the most confusing mish mash of doublethink I’ve seen recently.
    Unfortunately, Orwellian concepts are becoming mainstream thinking.

  4. H B Bear says:

    The next Green Senator?

  5. Roger says:

    The only way this could be more Adelaide was if it was dismembered in a barrel.

    It’s early days.

  6. cuckoo says:

    The only way this could be more Adelaide was if it was dismembered in a barrel.

    There would also need to be satanism in the mix.

  7. Riversutra says:

    Keep going HB..
    The next Green Senator? The only way this could be more Adelaide was if it was dismembered in a barrel.
    you’re on a roll

  8. Professor Fred Lenin says:

    Where is the hyphenated name ? Thats an Adelaide thing isnt it ? I laughed when I read the heading , modern “comedy ” writers couldnt invent stuff like that ,its priceless Monty Pythonesque , I can hear John Cleese reading it out as the news .

  9. mareeS says:

    Francis The Mad at work again. He is the reason I will remain Catholic, just so there is a chance of getting rid of him.

  10. Up The Workers! says:

    I wonder whether the lead-actor in this Leftard farce wears a pair of Dodgy Don Dunstan’s old pink Parliamentary Hot-Pants whilst conducting Anglican Church Services in Adelaide?

    Specifically, which one of the 89 different Leftard genders is this Anglican Minister, and how would you go about definitively proving it? Does the Minister have black, brown, white, yellow or red skin?

    Why is it that the dullards of the Looney Left always want to separate and discriminate between people on the basis of their race, skin colour, religion and gender?

    Apartheid is SO Leftard!

  11. Roger says:

    Why is it that the dullards of the Looney Left always want to separate and discriminate between people on the basis of their race, skin colour, religion and gender?

    Divide and rule!

  12. Tim Neilson says:

    Actually this looks to me like world class trolling.
    What are the “progressives” going to do? Claim that “she” is really still male so it’s all ok?

  13. stevem says:

    Actually this looks to me like world class trolling.

    Especially when you consider that fact that “she” was ordained 25 years ago and showed no interest in actually practicing as a priest until after becoming a “woman”.

    It seems that “she” decided to stir the pot with a new found sense of entitlement.

  14. Roger says:

    Especially when you consider that fact that “she” was ordained 25 years ago and showed no interest in actually practicing as a priest until after becoming a “woman”.

    No, he practised as a priest but not in the Adelaide archdiocese.

  15. Up The Workers! says:

    To stevem at 10.36 a.m.

    “It seems that “she” decided to stir the pot with a new found sense of entitlement.”

    Wow! Gutsy effort.
    That really takes some balls!

  16. PB says:

    The Church needs to draw a line in the glitter and stand firm.

  17. Delta says:

    Wow! Gutsy effort.
    That really takes some balls!

    Has he got some?

  18. H B Bear says:

    Has he got some ?

    That is not a question you ask in polite society.

  19. Gerry says:

    Poe’s law?

  20. There’s a simple solution. Her wife could transition to male gender. They could then be opposite biological sexes, while identifying as the opposite opposite genders.

  21. Megan says:

    And what is the biblical teaching on this issue? Surely that’s the first stop on the ‘journey’, Sorel dear.

    The distance between traditional Christian teachings and the tortured reality they demand the wider world accept is approaching galactic proportions.

    And she is a counsellor for trans children. Hells bells!

  22. Baa Humbug says:

    This whole tranny issue can be simply explained thus:-

    A tiny fraction of the population wanted some recognition and respite from persecution….and rightly so.
    Then a bunch of hairy legged cross dressing blokes saw an opportunity and fucked it up for everybody.

    That is the tranny story in a nut shell.

  23. Professor Fred Lenin says:

    [Now now, Fred].

  24. Peter Smith says:

    This from the archbishop got me:
    “In my view granting you [permission to officiate] at this time would be to get ahead of where the church currently is on these matters, and for that reason would not be appropriate for me to do…If the church’s position on same-sex marriage changes or is further clarified and it becomes appropriate for me to reconsider your request, I will certainly do that.”
    So, he thinks the Anglican church might actually exorcise particular parts of the bible? What pantywaists these priests are.

  25. Jock says:

    Dumb question. If the male priest transitions and I doubt that is remotely possible unless the y chromosomes are detachable , and he changes his birth certificate to female , will that lead to the birth certificates if his children also being changed. ?? Just wondering how far the changes go.

  26. Gyro Cadiz says:

    What would Henry VIII do?

  27. Imagine a will where the beneficiaries are “my son and my daughter” and the son has transitioned. If at death there’s no son and “daughter” is now not singular, can they claim the inheritance?

  28. Ƶĩppʯ (ȊꞪꞨV) says:

    Archbishop bars male priest from ministry because he’s now a ‘she’ and that means ‘her’ 28-year marriage (to a woman) is now ‘same sex’ and the archbishop can’t recognise that as authentic even though the ‘woman’ insists ‘she’ and ‘her’ wife are not gay

    not gay, just mentally ill

  29. Judge Dredd says:

    Oh an Anglican “priest”, so not a real priest then.

  30. The Sheriff says:

    Courtesy of Pope Benedict, any Anglican who actually believed in Christianity would have already abandoned that useless church and joined the Personal Ordinariate of the Chair of Saint Peter. What’s leftover in the Anglican Church is increasingly an embarrassing replica of the Uniting Church.

  31. Cassie of Sydney says:

    “Baa Humbug
    #3608953, posted on October 6, 2020 at 12:13 pm
    This whole tranny issue can be simply explained thus:-

    A tiny fraction of the population wanted some recognition and respite from persecution….and rightly so.
    Then a bunch of hairy legged cross dressing blokes saw an opportunity and fucked it up for everybody.

    That is the tranny story in a nut shell.”

    I understand what you are saying BA but it is much…much….more perverse than that. You now have a tiny fraction of the population who insist they are no different to biological women and if you disagree with them then you are smeared as a bigot, a TERF, a transphobe and so on. The “tranny story” is usually a story of mental illness, autogynephilia and deep seated misogyny.

  32. Baa Humbug says:

    but it is much…much….more perverse than that.

    That’s true Cassie. I just didn’t want to go any further than the first chapter. What started it all.

  33. Shy Ted says:

    When they transition, why do they stop half way there?

  34. Albatross says:

    Judge Dredd
    #3609258, posted on October 6, 2020 at 5:47 pm
    Oh an Anglican “priest”, so not a real priest then.

    This.

Comments are closed.