Ahahahahahahahahaha

 
Enraged wacko Chuck Schumer added: “Generations of unborn will suffer from this decision [to confirm ACB].”

This entry was posted in American politics, Rule of law. Bookmark the permalink.

59 Responses to Ahahahahahahahahaha

  1. HT

    I think people need a sense of perspective…

  2. Old School Conservative

    Darkest day? Only in the context of it’s always darkest before the dawn.

  3. Judge Dredd

    God bless America. And then next week we will get another tsunami of sweet liberal tears and a gnashing of teeth. The ride never stops.

  4. The BigBlueCat

    “Generations of unborn will suffer from this decision [to confirm ACB].”

    No, I hope that generations of unborn saved from unnecessary abortion will thank the Senate for this decision.

  5. Mother Lode

    Schumer ahead of Barrett vote: “Today … will go down as one of the darkest days in the 231-year history of the United States Senate.”

    Why? Have they been appointing only progressive hacks to the Supreme Court for 231 years?

  6. ACTOldFart

    If the unborn are to suffer, it is way more likely to happen under the Democrats, who never miss an opportunity to throw more and more money at the abortion industry. The great thing about Democrats is that they are (a) appalling hypocrites, and (b) too damn stupid even to see how hypocritical they are.

  7. Professor Fred Lenin

    231 years ? Was that the year before Biden,Pelosi and Poops Nadler were first elected ?

  8. Lee

    Enraged wacko Chuck Schumer added: “Generations of unborn will suffer from this decision [to confirm ACB].”

    “Generations of unborn” (because of abortion) never worried morally reprehensible people and scum like Schumer before.

  9. Rob MW

    Judge Amy Coney Barrett confirmed to Supreme Court of the United States.

    She was absolutely mind blownly brilliant at the confirmation hearings.

    Congrat’s now Justice Barrett.

  10. Professor Fred Lenin

    Whats wrong with saving babies from being murdered ? Isnt that a moral thing to do ?
    Or does itcomtravene the selfishness of the left agenda ?

  11. Can’t wait for the tsunami that’s coming that will wash away the global leftards for years to come . Being Dumb as shit isn’t a winning move … And leftards are dumber than shit ….. God bless the Donald …. drain the Swamp. !

  12. Tom

    Schumer ahead of Barrett vote: “Today … will go down as one of the darkest days in the 231-year history of the United States Senate.”

    Barrett’s elevation to SCOTUS is indeed momentous, Chucky. From now on, if you want a law passed, it has to be democratically through the Congress, not via the SCOTUS backdoor.

    The era of cheating the electorate via SCOTUS is over. That is why liberals hate Barrett.

  13. tombell

    pity ScoMo can’t do anything about the borders. he just can’t play hardball I’m afraid.

  14. flyingduk

    next week we will get another tsunami of sweet liberal tears

    oh, Liberal tears are anything but sweet….!

  15. Bad Samaritan

    I’m wondering whether the Reps can increase the Supreme Court to say 15 judges and then pack it for a 12-3 majority. Maybe appoint members of Donald’s family if they can’t find the extra six?

    Can any resident troll give us their legal opinion on the constitutionality of this?

  16. Roger

    “Generations of unborn will suffer from this decision [to confirm ACB].”

    Alas, that perverted reasoning is all too evident among our politicians’ arguments in favour of abortion.

  17. Leo G

    “Generations of unborn will suffer from this decision [to confirm ACB].”

    But none of “none of woman born” perhaps.

  18. Mother Lode

    It was amazing to watch the hearings – the Democrats almost never queried her past judgements, which would have been the best indicator for how she would perform on the SCOTUS.

    If her history is of sound legal judgements then what does it matter if she is a devout Catholic, Buddhist, or high ranking votary of Baal (to get the infanticide angle in there for Democrats). It would just mean she was able to separate her beliefs from requirements of the role gifted her by the state.

    I really think progressives do not get that. That sometimes you are in a role where your are not to indulge your personal preferences.

    They again and again sought to have her pass a judgement on incomplete hypotheticals – essentially to confirm she would approach certain cases with a prejudice. She patiently explained again and again that she can only judge on a case which has been set out completely before her.

    I saw one senator hopelessly confused when he instead thought he had her: There had been a case involving the right of felon’s who had been convicted of a non-violent crime to own a weapon. The other judges said he shouldn’t. She felt it was not quite so cut and dried – this is where he thought he had her look like a gun nut, pointing out that felons are also forbidden to run for office or to vote. She explained that the right to bear arms was a personal right – the right to defend yourself. Voting and office are civil rights involving participation in society. The person in the case was a non-violent felon.

    Then there was the grotesque Kamala who asked her if she accepted that cigarettes cause cancer (and I think also whether she accepted that obesity caused heart attacks), then asked her to similarly declare that Climate Change was also an evil. ACB calmly said it was a controversial topic and she would judge a case on its merits when presented to the court.

    Then Kamala started ranting on about how the process was illegitimate because Covid – the President should be focused on that. But he had a policy already and he was not involved in the hearings. A political rant.

    The overall impression was that ACB was an intelligent, thoughtful, measured, careful judge fully aware of what the job entailed and what it did not. The senators looked infantile.

  19. Roger

    I really think progressives do not get that. That sometimes you are in a role where your are not to indulge your personal preferences.

    That would be because they politicise everything. Even ice cream.

  20. Infidel Tiger

    Never Trump would have given these 3 SCOTUS picks to Hillary Clinton.

  21. Bruce of Newcastle

    Schumer should take that bag off his head.
    Seems like a bright day to me.
    Maybe he’s wearing his mask wrong.

  22. hzhousewife

    What I like most about ACB is that she is exact and concise.
    Unlike most politicians.
    Very happy today, and it was 48/52.

  23. Arnost

    Biden now needs to be asked if he will pack the court. [He vacillated I think on the basis that the vote / confirmation was not had – and now that excuse is gone]

  24. Os

    In Schumer’s world those generations of unborn will be dead.

  25. mh

    Ilhan Omar
    @IlhanMN

    US House candidate, MN-5
    Expand the court.

    Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
    @AOC

    US House candidate, NY-14
    Expand the court.
    10:16 AM · Oct 27, 2020

  26. Blair

    “Generations of unborn will suffer from this decision [to confirm ACB]”
    How?

  27. min

    AOC already suggesting to expand the court

  28. duncanm

    The left’s implosion after this election will be epic.

    There won’t be enough beer and popcorn

  29. Dianeh

    I’m sure there are many people (generations?) regretting that their mother chose to give them life rather than abort them?

    Nah.

  30. Roger

    “Generations of unborn will suffer from this decision [to confirm ACB]”
    How?

    He’s referring to children that won’t be aborted if Roe v Wade is overturned.

  31. Leigh Lowe

    Infidel Tiger

    #3634502, posted on October 27, 2020 at 12:21 pm

    Never Trump would have given these 3 SCOTUS picks to Hillary Clinton.

    Yep.
    Imagine if a Romney type had been elected in 2016 instead of Trump.
    A deal would have been done to affirm RBG’s own succession pick in the interests of “bipartisanship”.

  32. Phill

    Trump taught republicans to give the dems no quarter. Major achievement.

  33. Ƶĩppʯ (ȊꞪꞨV)

    Trump taught republicans to give the dems no quarter. Major achievement.

    treat like the infantile imbeciles they are

  34. C.L.

    Nancy Pelosi reacts: flags expansion of Supreme Court and “the other courts.”

    https://twitter.com/DailyCaller/status/1320892877271162880

  35. dasher

    Schumer brings new meaning to jumping the shark.

  36. Roger

    Nancy Pelosi reacts: flags expansion of Supreme Court and “the other courts.”

    Another shot in the cold civil war.

  37. Blair

    ““Generations of unborn will suffer from this decision [to confirm ACB]”
    How?”
    “He’s referring to children that won’t be aborted if Roe v Wade is overturned.”
    So generations of unborn children will suffer by being born?

  38. Leigh Lowe

    2050:-
    Nancy Pelosi (still not dead) proposes to expand the Supreme Court to 201 justices, to give the Dimocrats a 111-90 majority.

  39. Scott Osmond

    Well Chucky may well be right. If generations to come are actually born they will have to suffer all the challenges and trials of living. Imagine all the teenage crushes, tears and tantrums. But they may well have a chance of enjoying happiness and feel the triumph of achieving a long faught goal. Few things are as satisfying as seeing a project finished after years of work. This won’t stop the death cult as if Biden wins the left has already got a plan to stack the court. The left have only one principle that of unrestrained power in their hands and no one elses.

  40. H B Bear

    They aren’t taking this well. Are they?

  41. Bruce of Newcastle

    Ilhan Omar
    @IlhanMN

    US House candidate, MN-5
    Expand the court.

    Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
    @AOC

    US House candidate, NY-14
    Expand the court.
    10:16 AM · Oct 27, 2020

    Well if those ladies want the court expanded that nice Mr Trump should give them what they ask for.

  42. John A

    Enraged wacko Chuck Schumer added: “Generations of unborn will suffer from this decision [to confirm ACB].”

    Os #3634514, posted on October 27, 2020, at 12:38 pm

    In Schumer’s world those generations of unborn will be dead.

    Scott Osmond #3634596, posted on October 27, 2020, at 1:42 pm

    Well Chucky may well be right. If generations to come are actually born they will have to suffer all the challenges and trials of living.

    Exactly.

    Those “unborn” are actually YET TO BE born rather than NEVER born. At least they will have a chance to express their own views in this world (as well as the next).

  43. Rob MW

    ACB’s oath. A very impressive person.

    Trump, however, was/is also impressive. Watch his gentleman’s politeness towards ACB, her husband, Melania and Justice Thomas at the very end of the video – 39:42. This is not the Trump the left portray.

  44. feelthebern

    Ilhan Omar
    @IlhanMN

    US House candidate, MN-5
    Expand the court.

    Women’s basketball is boring enough as it is.

  45. Kev from Canberra

    Please, allow me to continue for you: Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaa

  46. dover_beach

    Is it just me or is Richard Marles really off-putting?

  47. Mother Lode #3634497, posted on October 27, 2020 at 12:17 pm

    Well said.

  48. Bazinga

    “Generations of unborn will suffer from this decision [to confirm ACB].”

    …but they might have a chance to be born

  49. Leo G

    Schumer seems to think it is more humaine to kill an unborne then allow them to suffer being born, having a life, and only then to die.
    Perhaps he feels no life is worth the suffering.

  50. Boambee John

    LeoG

    Perhaps he feels no life is worth the suffering

    Then perhaps Schumer should lead by example?

  51. John A

    Two speeches of less than 15 minutes total duration which sum up why the swampies hate the president and the Supreme Court, and are trying to do whatever they can to destroy both.

  52. Professor Fred Lenin

    When Jerry Nadler who has n\been a democrinm in congress for nearly 300 years , shit himself on tv , a republican said ” Jerry why dont you go to the restroom and clean up ,” Jerry replied ” I havent finished yet .”

  53. Oh come on

    Generations of unborn will suffer from this decision [to confirm ACB].”

    The unborn? Why single out the unborn? Oh right it’s about abortion (isn’t it always). So generations of unborn are going to suffer by being born – or not being aborted? That’s the kind of suffering I can get on board with. Thanks for clarifying what’s at stake.

  54. wozzup

    Enraged wacko Chuck Schumer added: “Generations of unborn will suffer from this decision [to confirm ACB].”

    Which is kind of an ironic thing to say. Considering that if the Dem’s worst fears were to come to fruition with regard to ACB’s stance on abortion, generations of unborn will live long enough to be borne. Instead of being aborted and sold for body parts. But perhaps that is what he means – generations of babies will be borne who would have been aborted. And they will now live and suffer under the tyranny of future leftist governments. Oops freudian slip!

  55. Jannie

    Generations of unaborted disagree.

  56. Louis Litt

    Women’s right over their bodies to abort. All I see/hear is the male say “ Am I glad she got rid of that little bastard”. The women’s has a steel stake inserted up her, the baby is stabbed to death and then she has to live with the physical , mental damage.
    How can this not effect you- ah yes be strong.
    Then the male leaves. Hazel Hawke had an abortion so Bob could go to Cambridge – won the skulling a beer competition. What a legend.

Comments are closed.