20 years from now, a Liberal government may prosecute them

This is the photograph accompanying that report. Just look at this goofball.

Do not fly the flag upside down, even as a signal of distress.
Do not allow the flag to fall or lie on the ground or be used as a cover…

See: Australian National Flag Protocols. Department of Prime Minister & Cabinet.

 
Accordingly, I put it to you that using the Australian flag as a snot and germ cover is undignified and unlawful.

This entry was posted in COVID-19, Politics, War and peace. Bookmark the permalink.

24 Responses to 20 years from now, a Liberal government may prosecute them

  1. Mak Siccar

    Couldn’t agree more CJ.

    A bit off topic but nowhere else to post it. This article in today’s Australian. No comments of course.

    SAS just wants the truth. We do not have a callous disregard for human life.

    SERVING AND FORMER SAS OPERATORS

    10:21PM NOVEMBER 16, 2020

    For the first time in the history of the Australian Special Air Service Regiment, and after much internal deliberation, a small group of soldiers has made the collective decision to step out from the shadows to remind our country what they are, and what they are not.

    We are the soldiers, the ‘Operators’ as we are known, who have served and are continuing to serve in the SASR.

    We have decided to speak, as one, to the Australian public, who have trusted us and invested in us to defend our country for more than 60 years.

    All of us have been carefully selected for the privilege of serving our country in the SASR. Our government has invested millions of dollars of public money in each one of us to provide you with unique and specialised capabilities in the defence of our nation.

    Our Regiment is now the subject of the longest inquiry into allegations of war crimes conducted by the Australian Defence Force.

    Accusations and allegations of war crimes as well as failures of leadership cut to the very core of the SASR. Such actions go against the very purpose of who we are as an organisation, and against the very nature of who we are as individuals.

    We are not indifferent to human suffering. We do not have a callous disregard for human life. We are however, selected for our unwavering moral compasses that we proudly hang our Sandy Berets on. We are not out of control. Indeed, we have spent most our professional soldiering careers in the SASR drilling and exercising, specifically to avoid casualties among non-combatants.

    We define SASR mission success by how precisely we can apply the minimum amount of force to achieve a desired strategic outcome with the absolute minimal loss of human life. This is evident in the tens of thousands of missions and programs we have carried out around the world.

    We are all singularly bound by the principle of “truth in reporting”.

    This principle underpins our single most important regimental capability: long-range surveillance and reconnaissance. Truth in reporting enables the SASR to act as the operational eyes and ears of the ADF and the Australian government — without truth in reporting, we are nothing.

    As early as 2006, it was our commitment to truth in reporting that instigated what has now resulted in the four-year-long Brereton inquiry into allegations of war crimes in Afghanistan.

    Truth in reporting is why we spoke up then and now.

    The matters before us are of an extremely grave nature, and we accept that the impact of the Brereton inquiry may adversely affect former and serving members and their families, as well as our strategic relationships with other coalition forces around the world.

    Whatever the outcome, we prefer our Regimental history to reflect hard truths over comforting fantasy. If it can be destroyed by the truth, it deserves to be destroyed by the truth.

    We also believe that the same principle of truth in reporting should be embraced by the media, so as not to unduly impugn the reputation of the SASR as a whole, or inadvertently imply improper behaviour committed by former or serving members. Equally, we applaud accurate portrayals of misconduct provided it is supported by appropriate context and evidence.

    Just as we embrace truth in reporting, we demand our leadership to do the same. Leaders are bound in their duty to convey what we have seen and reported and we hold them to the same standards to which we hold ourselves.

    It is our relentless pursuit of individual and organisational excellence that defines us as an organisation and a Regiment.

    We lead by example. On combat operations, we were forced to sacrifice many of our technological advantages over highly adaptive adversaries who knew no rules or bounds. We accepted continually shifting goal posts and decisions made by governments in the absence of a defined campaign outcome in Afghanistan. We begrudgingly accepted these strategic decisions while attempting to effectively operate in an environment characterised by uncertainty, danger and our own casualties.

    We are not war criminals, nor have we ever set our morality aside. We are professional volunteer soldiers who frequently upheld the values of the Australian Army during a 10-year expeditionary campaign in the Middle East, despite the absence of any clear definition of victory.

    We believe in the same legal principles that underpin the very fabric of Australian society, something that we have sworn to defend with our lives.

    We support the removal from the Regiment and legal prosecution of anyone found guilty of breaching of the Laws of Armed Conflict, the Geneva Convention or the Rules of Engagement. We outright reject and despise criminality in all its forms, especially in the context of soldiering. We support unbiased investigatory due process, the rule of law and the burden of proof. There is absolutely no place in the ADF, least of all in the SASR, for any individual who believes they are untouchable or above the law.

    Having had full legal representation, should it be proven that any former or serving individuals within the SASR have acted outside the law or the expected standards and behaviours demanded of an Australian soldier, we underline that we will wholeheartedly support their prosecution and removal from the Regiment. They have acted against everything the SASR fights and stands for. They are not one of us.

    We are committed to accepting the outcomes and consequences of the Brereton inquiry and to action its recommendations. Then we will return to the shadows where we belong. We do not seek to be glorified for our actions or demonstrating our moral courage. We only seek the validation that truth in reporting is who we are and what we do.

    We are proud of the internal examinations into our Regiment that have highlighted a culture of toughness and professionalism of the extraordinary men and women who do extraordinary work under extraordinary circumstances.

    We are the tactical, operational and strategic eyes and ears for the ADF and the Australian government, with strategic and innovative capabilities to reach out and strike our adversaries when required.

    We are soldiers, we are professionals, and we are Australians. We are committed to upholding the values of the Australian Defence Force. We believe in truth in reporting, moral courage and constant vigilance from the shadows in defence of Australia.

    We are the SASR. Who Dares Wins.

    These words are endorsed five serving and seven former SAS operators.

  2. Nighthawk the Elder

    20 years from now, Liberal governments will have been consigned to the dust bin of history, having long abandoned their core principles.

  3. jupes

    We are committed to accepting the outcomes and consequences of the Brereton inquiry and to action its recommendations.

    This is just dumb. The recommendations from the stupid and treasonous Brereton inquiry is going to destroy the Regiment.

    Fight you bastards!

  4. jupes

    On combat operations, we were forced to sacrifice many of our technological advantages over highly adaptive adversaries who knew no rules or bounds. We accepted continually shifting goal posts and decisions made by governments in the absence of a defined campaign outcome in Afghanistan. We begrudgingly accepted these strategic decisions while attempting to effectively operate in an environment characterised by uncertainty, danger and our own casualties.

    Shorter: We were pumped over by our leaders who did not give a fuck.

  5. jupes

    Morrison just gets more pathetic by the day.

  6. rickw

    That’s what an idiocracy looks like.

  7. Shy Ted

    Better poll a few lefties to show how popular he is.

  8. covid ate my homework

    Morrison has rendered Turnbull irrelevant in the category of spineless limp-wristed snot rag.

  9. Enyaw

    At least they could have put it on Him the correct way . Ignorant advisors ..

  10. Eyrie

    Morrison has rendered Turnbull irrelevant in the category of spineless limp-wristed snot rag.
    +1

  11. sabena

    Remember the Polyukhovich case?
    He was prosecuted for war crimes in the Ukraine.Originally charged with 24 murders and complicity in 850 other murders.Charges for 6 murders went to trial and he was acquitted.Two other alleged war criminals Berezowski & Wagner were not brought to trial.
    The War Crimes Special Investigation Unit was closed by Michael Duffy,the Labor Attorney General.
    These are ominous precedents for successfully prosecuting members of the SAS who, unlike the above, are Australian citizens.
    And, of course,there is the potential for embarassment of senior officers in the chain of command.
    A fiasco is probably in the making.

  12. Noddy

    The wrong people are being investigated! It should start with the Minister for Defence and down the line to gather in ALL the politicians who voted to send Australian Forces overseas.
    Then there is the penny-pinching bureaucracy who equip the Forces with materials made by the lowest tenderer … what a pack of bastards!
    Look closely at the ‘NEW’ submarines – you couldn’t trust them to buy a rowing boat. Who is carrying on about ‘land deals’?! I am reminded of the slogan/sticker on the back of a ute “If you can read this then thank a teacher – if you can read it in English then thank the Australian Defence Forces”.
    The ABC has a history of debunking honorable Australian Institutions and more … God and Country, The Flag and Constitution, and the nuclear Family. The ABC tears down and never UP!
    Ita should be ashamed! But then she would have no say and only a ‘useful’ figurehead for the destroyers.

  13. Scernus

    They just published the photo upside down.

    He was actually hanging from the rafters like a ding-bat popularist, seeking attention (probably due to his compatriots Krudd and Turdball stealing it all).

  14. lily

    When Morrison stood in front of Parliament House with his arm draped around his best mate Malcolm Turnbull, I knew what was in store for all of us. Morrison is a FRAUD have a look at him speaking to a bigger fraud Sleepy Joe Biden, Morrison looks like a big kid in a lolly shop.

  15. Eyrie

    ScoMo is a complete boofhead.
    We certainly don’t get smart people in politics in Oz.
    A fair number of people I’ve been talking to recently don’t think we have a Federation any longer.
    Have to vote on Nov 28. The Lib will certainly win Groom. He ‘s a used to be mining engineer. We’ll see.

  16. H B Bear

    You can see why SloMo was in marketing.

  17. Gavin R Putland

    Ahem… Scomo is not wearing the mask upside-down. It was made upside-down. It can only be worn with the same edge up, due to the nose wire.

  18. covid ate my homework

    Right Gavin. If I’d have seen that hanging on a hook somewhere I wouldn’t even wipe my arse with it let alone buy it. That’s no mistake either, treasonous behavior.

  19. C.L.

    Ahem… Scomo is not wearing the mask upside-down.

    Did I say he was?

  20. candy

    Why would he wear it knowing it was upside down, or who let him go about like that (assuming the picture is not doctored).

  21. Richard Bender

    If it is unlawful, it shouldn’t be. But then again, that’s the sort of anti-freedom, authoritarian bullshit that gets advocated on this ‘libertarian’ blog these days.

Comments are closed.