“The markings of an organized operation planned well in advance”

A Congress windows is seen destroyed, two days after Pro Trump's demonstrators protest against Joe Biden's certify as US President-elect, today on January 09, 2021 in Washington DC, USA. (Photo by Lenin Nolly/Sipa USA)(Sipa via AP Images)

None of this should come as a surprise: I Saw Provocateurs At The Capitol Riot On Jan. 6.

The deadly riot at the U.S. Capitol bore the markings of an organized operation planned well in advance of the Jan. 6 joint session of Congress.

  1. A small number of cadre appeared to use the cover of a huge rally to stage its attack. Before it began, I saw from my vantage point on the West Front of the Capitol what appeared to be four separate cells or units:
  2. Plainclothes militants. Militant, aggressive men in Donald Trump and MAGA gear at a front police line at the base of the temporary presidential inaugural platform;
  3. Agents-provocateurs. Scattered groups of men exhorting the marchers to gather closely and tightly toward the center of the outside of the Capitol building and prevent them from leaving;Fake Trump protesters. A few young men wearing Trump or MAGA hats backwards and who did not fit in with the rest of the crowd in terms of their actions and demeanor, whom I presumed to be Antifa or other leftist agitators; and
  4. Disciplined, uniformed column of attackers. A column of organized, disciplined men, wearing similar but not identical camouflage uniforms and black gear, some with helmets and GoPro cameras or wearing subdued Punisher skull patches.

All of these cells or groups stood out from the very large crowd by their behavior and overall demeanor. However, they did not all appear at the same time. Not until the very end did it appear there was a prearranged plan to storm the Capitol building, and to manipulate the unsuspecting crowd as cover and as a follow-on force.

It’s long and you should read it all if you are interested in the details.

Meanwhile, do we yet know who shot Ashli Babbitt? Or why she was marked for death even while others are shattering the glass at the front of the crowd before the entrance? Interesting to also note who was taking the video at the moment she was shot: Black Activist Who Filmed Ashli Babbitt Shooting Speaks Out. He was not a Trump supporter. Why was he of all people right there?

John Sullivan, a.k.a. Jayden X, is a civil rights activist and crowdfunded video journalist. On January 6th, he donned a bulletproof vest and embedded himself in the masses that President Trump had incited to storm the Capitol. Sullivan scrambled up scaffolding and repeatedly weaved through a crush of rioters to record clashes between the mob and law enforcement. He emerged with a raw, hour-and-a-half frontline documentary of the day’s violent and chaotic events. He captures now-notorious figures from the riot, including the shirtless, face-painted “QAnon Shaman” and the bearded rioter dressed in a grotesquely anti-Semitic “Camp Auschwitz” sweatshirt. Crucially, Sullivan’s camerawork captured the shooting of 35-year-old mob member and Air Force veteran Ashli Babbitt, who was killed by the Capitol Police while attempting to clamber through a broken window into the Speaker’s Lobby off the House floor.

Again, it is very very odd that he was there, an obvious Antifa member, just then videoing. Meanwhile, do we know the identity of the “protestors” who shattered the glass in front of the Speakers Lobby?  In fact, do we even know the identity of whoever it was who fired that fatal shot that killed Ashli Babbitt and why whoever it was did not fire at the people who were shattering the glass at that very moment who were much closer to him than Ashli was?

This entry was posted in American politics, Politics of the Left. Bookmark the permalink.

92 Responses to “The markings of an organized operation planned well in advance”

  1. pbw says:

    Ashli was on the way through the window. She was the first one through.

    One of the Capitol officers has committed suicide. I don’t know whether he was the one who shot Ashli.

  2. Texas Jack says:

    Trump really should be egging Pelosi on.

  3. WDYSIA says:

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5nvqvvsqJ_s

    This video – don’t be put off by the source – has footage of the shooting from two angles and focuses on the people around Babbitt. These were not all Trump supporters even if she was. Note the guy who does a runner and changes his appearance.

  4. sfw says:

    Like the Reichstag fire, the truth or as close as you can get to it won’t come out for many years.

  5. Behind Enemy Lines says:

    The ‘Redpilled’ site believes they’ve identified Ashli Babbitt’s murderer as Special Agent David Bailey. Not sure whether any denials have been issued.

    This ‘provocateur’ business has a powerful stench of Q-tardism about it. Granted, it’s clear that there were criminal antifa elements present. It’s also clear that there were also plenty of patriots angry about having the presidential and senate elections stolen, and wanting to be heard. Before I make any firmer conclusions about what happened, I want to see who actually gets charged, and for what, and which law firm defends them, and which of them are let off.

  6. Oscr says:

    There are reports of more groups than normal touring inside on the 5th. Presumably to reconnoitre.

  7. min says:

    The other evidence that has been presented is that the timeline is out as Trump was still speaking when the the first attack on the capitol building occurred . The distance from where the rally was held is 45 minutes walk from the capitol , roads were blocked off , phone communication was also interfered with as many journalists complained . There is also video of two buses of antifa arriving at rally escorted by State Police cars.
    What perplexed me watching videos from various sources was where they were taken ,looked to be behind the police inside the building that is already in place as the so called rioters were let in .

  8. Rockdoctor says:

    Jayden X was “arrested then released without charge.” Why? They are hunting down all the others with a zeal never applied to those who stormed the Supreme Court during Kavanaghs hearing or those who stormed one of the state legislatures last year. Double standards again?

  9. mh says:

    When I was looking through #stopthesteal on the morning of the rally, there were tweets of the crowd with two or three faces circled with a message ‘Careful out there today, these are Antifa’.

    I didn’t post the tweets here, as it’s twitter and there is so much bullshit.

  10. Indolent says:

    Special Agent David Bailey
    According to this article it was deliberate murder.

  11. Behind Enemy Lines says:

    Indolent
    #3724855, posted on January 15, 2021 at 8:28 am

    According to this article it was deliberate murder.

    Yes, it was murder, as plain as can be. Stupid lawyer games won’t change that.

  12. 1735099 says:

    A few young men wearing Trump or MAGA hats backwards and who did not fit in with the rest of the crowd in terms of their actions and demeanor, whom I presumed to be Antifa or other leftist agitators;

    Well, there you go.
    Steve identifies Antifa by the obvious sign that they were wearing their MAGA hats backwards.
    What would have been their affiliation if they wore them sideways?
    Proud Boys, perhaps.
    There’s a whole complex costume code at work here.

  13. WDYSIA says:

    https://www.bizpacreview.com/2021/01/14/authorities-believe-military-like-small-unit-tactics-were-utilized-during-capitol-incursion-report-1016457/

    There is another video around that shows the moment a group breaks down and external barrier and leads a throng flooding into the Capitol compound. It was quite evident there that police were set up to control access not to control security. In any case this particular video which I can’t find now showed a couple of people being instigators. There was one young man who started joining them in pushing down the barriers and a guy in camouflage gear pulled him away but the others continued. The person who was filming was standing some way back. I wish I could find that video again because I wonder whether it was the same lot that were at the Bobbitt shooting.

  14. Tom says:

    The Paywallian’s man in Washington, Cameron Stewart, not only writes every day about how much he loathes the US president, his laziness and incuriosity about the real story behind the subversion of the Trump Capitol rally makes him a useful idiot for the antifa/Democratic Party propaganda war to remove him from office after the election fraud of the past two months:

    Donald Trump will leave the White House in disgrace after being impeached for the second time amid growing anger across America for his role in inciting his supporters to storm the US Capitol.

    Mr Trump’s public approval ratings have Donald Trump will leave the White House in disgrace after being impeached for the second time amid growing anger across America for his role in inciting his supporters to storm the US Capitol.

    Mr Trump’s public approval ratings have nosedived to record lows with key Republican loyalists turning on the President, leaving him an isolated and diminished figure as he serves out his last days in office.

    The historic impeachment vote was taken amid extraordinary ­security as armed National Guard troops roamed the corridors of the Capitol that was the scene of riots last week in which five people died.

  15. Rockdoctor says:

    Mr Trump’s public approval ratings have nosedived to record lows

    Uhhh, didn’t Rasmussen have his approval rating up or something the other day. Never let the truth get in the way of a good story hey?

  16. Struth says:

    The lies being told are working.
    They certainly are here in Australia.
    People I know well were sitting around the other morning with the channel seven sunrise show on in the background.
    A couple shook their heads and muttered about the evil of Trump inciting riots.
    I said, no wonder you hate Trump, I would to if I believed therot you are watching.
    Can any of you guys tell me what time his speech was given and what time the police opened the doors to the people at the capital, or even how far one was from the other?
    Silence.
    I know we all are supposed to hate Trump, but what have the yanks going to now get with China Joe, is that of concern?
    Like his policies?
    One of my mates said, er, yeah, you know, I don’t disagree with everything he has done, but he’s got to go.
    They all nodded furiously as I went out the door.
    No doubt I would have been the topic of conversation for the next five minutes.
    But they’ll come around, as the reality hits.

  17. 1735099 says:

    Mr Trump’s public approval ratings have nosedived to record lows

    True dat, if you look at the most recent polling.

    This time, the country is more broadly in agreement on the dire nature of what Trump has been accused of. Roughly 6 in 10 Americans said in the CBS poll that they thought the President had encouraged violence at the Capitol. A PBS NewsHour/Marist College survey conducted by phone on the day after the attack found 63% of the country saying the President bore considerable blame for the chaos.

    The effects on Trump’s approval numbers have been severe. In all recent polls, his job approval is in the mid- to high 30s, with roughly 3 in 5 Americans disapproving of his performance.

    While his unwavering support from about a third of the electorate has saved Trump from dipping into the 20s, where Richard M. Nixon and George W. Bush both were near the end of their presidencies, the latest numbers reflect his diminished support across the board, including among Republicans; his job approval among members of his own party, once almost universal, has dipped into the 70s.

  18. Struth says:

    Numbers quotes socialist propaganda as fact.
    Well you would, wouldn’t you.

  19. Rorschach says:

    John Sullivan has been indicted. There is some interesting detail in the filing on what happened on the day – essentially from 2pm on.

    https://www.justice.gov/opa/page/file/1354781/download

  20. 1735099 says:

    Can any of you guys tell me what time his speech was given and what time the police opened the doors to the people at the capital, or even how far one was from the other?

    I’m surprised they didn’t tell you that the mob were watching a livestream of his speech on their phones as they were forming up outside the Capitol. You can see numerous phones in numerous hands amongst the crowd.
    They do have excellent access to the various phone networks in Washington, old mate, or they did in 2018 when I was last there.

  21. Mother Lode says:

    embedded himself in the masses that President Trump had incited to storm the Capitol.

    The author undermines his credibility by stating as fact what is in fact at most uncertain but nevertheless demonstratively false.

    The moreso since he is arguing that the ‘riot’ (makes you think of hundreds at least) was instigated by premeditating agents provocateur rather than regular rally folk.

  22. 1735099 says:

    Numbers quotes socialist propaganda as fact.

    A survey report gets transmogrified to “propaganda” because it doesn’t suit your narrative.
    That’s how the Big Lie works.

  23. incoherent rambler says:

    The US survived the assassination of JFK (and RFK).
    Just.
    This is a different sort of assassination. I doubt the US will survive it.

  24. Rockdoctor says:

    Rorschach
    #3724928, posted on January 15, 2021 at 9:50 am

    Fair call and I did look for it. Funny how it has been buried news wise…

  25. Rex Anger says:

    They do have excellent access to the various phone networks in Washington, old mate, or they did in 2018 when I was last there.

    Ironic then, that so many parties were complaining bitterly about the cellular jamming going on about the Capitol that day.

    But whatever propaganda that helps crush thebClass Enemies, eh Bobby boy?

  26. Struth says:

    Feeling a little emboldened lately Numbers?
    Typical of a coward to wait for his side to seize power by force to start being cocky.

    Sad.

  27. Rex Mango says:

    Been all over Youtube last few days watching videos of the riot. Some make quite compelling viewing, as fascinating to see how you can take control of a crowd. Pretty obvious a large peaceful rally was hijacked by a few trouble makers. Who they were is a mystery, but they weren’t Trump supporters. The horned nutter was a vegan global warming activist & the bloke filming & yelling burn the Capitol down is Antifa. This woman’s photos from the day tell you a lot:

    https://twitter.com/Twinity5/status/1347346192229953537

  28. Rex Mango says:

    Another thing to remember is almost every punter had a camera, so there is thousands of hours of footage to pour through.

  29. candy says:

    I tend to think the demonising of MAGA folk as white supremacists and followers of KKK by the Democrats has led to Ashli’s murder.

    The secret service agent shoots an unarmed woman because it is believed she is a white supremacist and therefore her life has no value. Despite carrying no weapon she is virtually executed.

    The big lie is the media and Democrats persecuting MAGA folk, many many millions of them, as violent white supremacists. Why the Democrats think this is “healing” is puzzling.

  30. Turtle says:

    Pure Alinsky

  31. Rex Mango says:

    Anyone got any details about this bloke’s background, who witnessed the shooting?:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OzqLdXlRLu0

  32. Andre Lewis says:

    Rasmussen presidential poll does have Trump’s disapproval rating higher (and we know who is causing that) but his approval rating is climbing higher than in November and December. Can you guess which part of the poll the MSM focusses on?

  33. Turtle says:

    I think at this stage we can treat polls as worse than worthless.

  34. Turtle says:

    Sanford Horwitt prefaces his biography of Alinski, “Let Them Call Me Rebel”, with an anecdote he felt illuminated Alinsky’s method. In this anecdote, Alinsky shares his wisdom with students wishing to protest the appearance on their campus of the first George Bush, then America’s representative to the UN during the Vietnam War:

    College student activists in the 1960s and 1970s sought out Alinsky for advice about tactics and strategy. On one such occasion in the spring of 1972 at Tulane University’s annual week-long series of events featuring leading public figures, students asked Alinsky to help plan a protest for a scheduled speech by George Bush, then U. S. representative to the United Nations, a speech likely to be a defense of the Nixon Administration’s Vietnam War policies [Note: the Nixon Administration was then negotiating with the North Vietnamese Communists to arrive at a peace agreement-DH] The students told Alinsky that they were thinking about picketing or disrupting Bush’s address. That’s the wrong approach, he rejoined–not very relative and besides, causing a disruption might get them thrown out of school [Not very likely-DH] He told them, instead, to go hear the speech dressed up as members of the Ku Klux Klan, and whenever Bush said something in defense of the Vietnam War, they should cheer and wave placards, reading ‘The K.K.K. supports Bush.’ And that is what the students did with very successful, attention-getting results.

  35. Turtle says:

    (Quote)

  36. Boambee John says:

    They do have excellent access to the various phone networks in Washington, old mate, or they did in 2018 when I was last there.

    The possibility that mobile access might have deliberately been degraded that day to hinder the demonstrators seems not to be inscribed on the lining of the ostrich’s rectum.

  37. Boambee John says:

    Turtle
    #3725007, posted on January 15, 2021 at 10:55 am
    I think at this stage we can treat polls as worse than worthless.

    For a long time now. Most polling, like “fact checking” is essentially spin doctoring.

  38. Rex Mango says:

    Would be interesting to know how many rallies Trump have occured in last 5 years, how many people attended & how many arrests? I heard a woman saying she was happy to take her kids along as they were considered very safe. Strange this one turned sour.

  39. Leo G says:

    Well, there you go.
    Steve identifies Antifa by the obvious sign that they were wearing their MAGA hats backwards.
    What would have been their affiliation if they wore them sideways?

    Not so, Numbers. Steve was merely quoting from an article by J Michael Waller, who is senior analyst at the Center for Security Policy. Moreover Waller identified a number of ways that differentiated a small number of activists from the rest of the mob.
    The backward MAGA hats could accordingly have provided a simple means to distinguish fellow provocateurs among the mob.

  40. stackja says:

    What happened in DC?
    MSM many lies. Soon Biden people will cover up any alternative.

  41. Rex Mango says:

    Think easiest way to identify Antifa is by their first aid training. When someone shot, rather than rendering assistance, they film the event, casually pronounce ‘she’s dead’ then move along, while in the background another one changes his shirt to ease escape.

  42. Paul says:

    Yep, the demorats infiltrated the peaceful protest to create violence to frame Trump and his supporters. Thats how this impeachment was planned.

  43. Baa Humbug says:

    1735099
    #3724921, posted on January 15, 2021 at 9:47 am

    Mr Trump’s public approval ratings have nosedived to record lows

    True dat, if you look at the most recent polling.

    How about this then?

    OHIO – […] “Hicks opened the night by asking the audience a few questions. Is their support for Trump increasing, decreasing or staying the same?

    The mostly maskless audience used clickers to record their vote. On the big screen, a bar graphed flashed showing 77% of the 40 people there liked the president more in the past week; 23% had the same opinion. Not one had a lower opinion of the president.” (link)

    https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2021/01/14/ohio-focus-group-77-percent-like-trump-more-23-percent-same-opinion-zero-percent-like-less/

  44. Leo G says:

    The ‘Redpilled’ site believes they’ve identified Ashli Babbitt’s murderer as Special Agent David Bailey. Not sure whether any denials have been issued.
    This ‘provocateur’ business has a powerful stench of Q-tardism about it. Granted, it’s clear that there were criminal antifa elements present. It’s also clear that there were also plenty of patriots angry about …

    Is the information true though? It suggests a possibility that the shooter and video recordist were interacting and even that the victim, a Q aficionado, may have been groomed for the shooting.

  45. BrettW says:

    Good to see FBI wised up to Sullivan. Just joking but looking forward to CNN covering the arrest of their star witness.

  46. Professor Fred Lenin says:

    The Reichstag Fire sorry Storming of the capitol was part of a master plan , steal the election , steal the Georgia senate seats. Discredit Trump supporters using antifa fascist stormtroopers ,impeach Trump , on more lies ,them remove Trumps legacy by declaring him a non person ,all old fascist socialist ploys used by the socialists Hitler and Stalin . Sanctifying obama and the clintons ,all to give the ratfaced paedo what they consuder a good look . The ratfaced paedo and his criminal family will be enriched further , the clinto criminal foundation will be back in business ,and obams will go into the influence peddling business like the rest .
    Watch the homeless campds mushroom as the jobs are sold overseas and the socialists get filthy rich .
    They will create the cli ate for violent bloody revolution as the armed populace responds to their arrogance .

  47. Some History says:

    Rex Mango
    #3724990, posted on January 15, 2021 at 10:43 am
    Anyone got any details about this bloke’s background, who witnessed the shooting?:

    New Jersey man who witnessed Capitol shooting of Ashli Babbitt arrested

    https://www.foxnews.com/us/new-jersey-capitol-riot-ashli-babbitt-arrest

  48. Boambee John says:

    Some History

    Sorry, that can’t be true. the fat fascist fool munty, and the numerical ostrich have assured us absolutely that there could not possibly be any Antifa/BLM infiltration of the howling mob of Trump supporters, whipped up by the speech they could not have heard.

    And, as they assure us, Antifa and BLM are “mostly peaceful”, except when they are rioting, burning and killing.

  49. Rex Mango says:

    Just checked Wikipedia for Jake Angeli & it has him listed as Trump supporter, conspiracy theorist and Christian. It also debunks any links to Antifa, or BLM, how very convenient. Also interesting if you check any photo, the US flag he was carrying was hung on a spear. How was he allowed in public to walk around with a spear:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jake_Angeli

  50. Rex Mango says:

    S History, thanks just checked out Thomas Baranyi & couldn’t see much besides being in the Peace Corps. Here is good video of Sullivan spilling the beans – great the way these loons all film themselves:

    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/01/caught-video-antifa-protester-john-sullivan-brags-posing-trump-supporter-breaking-window-us-capitol-building-riots/

  51. Rex Mango says:

    Sullivan disguises himself as a Trump supporter & encourages others to burn the Capitol down, brags about his exploits to others on camera & is at the scene of the shooting, yet the fact checkers deny he incited anything. File under beyond parody:

    https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2021/jan/09/facebook-posts/facebook-posts-wrongly-claim-left-wing-activist-an/

  52. Some History says:

    Rex Mango
    #3725153, posted on January 15, 2021 at 1:17 pm

    Yep. That Politifact “fact check” is appalling. It concludes

    An analysis claims that antifa provoked the shooting of Ashli Babbitt.
    The analysis consists of a series of speculative claims and inferences based on video of the Babbitt shooting.

    Those claiming that the pro-Trump mob at the Capitol was incited by antifa have provided no hard proof of their assertions. The claims ignore substantial reporting and documentary evidence that the crowd contained Trump supporters.

    We rate this Pants on Fire!

    The Politifact “fact check” is pants-on-fire lying.

  53. Rex Mango says:

    Do wonder if Politifact ‘fact check’ noticed that Sullivan (the bravve war correspondent) filming the shooting, had a mate who quickly changed his shirt to escape when the girl went down & that the shooting was probably provoked by the bloke with the furry hat & backpack who was using his black helmet to smash the glass? No Antifa to see here.

  54. Boambee John says:

    SH

    Those claiming that the pro-Trump mob at the Capitol was incited by antifa

    I thought the claim was infiltrated by Antifa. Different thing entirely.

    Fact checking is just spin doctoring under a different name.

  55. Damon says:

    The real question is not who shot Ashli Babbit, but why she was shot. She was unarmed, presented no immediate threat to anybody, yet was deliberately gunned down. Obviously not by mistake, as videos show plenty of other people in the line of fire. And the cop was good, he shot to kill.

  56. Lee says:

    Sullivan disguises himself as a Trump supporter & encourages others to burn the Capitol down, brags about his exploits to others on camera & is at the scene of the shooting, yet the fact checkers deny he incited anything. File under beyond parody:

    Those who maintain with a straight face that Sullivan didn’t incite anyone, are the same sort of people who claim that Trump did.
    Dr. Goebbels would have been proud of Politifact.

  57. louis says:

    These Antifa guys would turn up to a Pro Life Christian Revival rally if they thought they could turn it into a riot and get to destroy property.

  58. WDYSIA says:

    The Epoch Times video I posted above has good analysis of the shooting with videos from two angles. See if you can see those two blokes yelling at the camera in the later video posted on this thread.

  59. WDYSIA says:

    Trump survived the first impeachment because his personal approval ratings were so high and that scared off republicans. The Dems know this is how the game is played which is why they’re trying to demonize him to make sure the impeachment succeeds and that he can therefore never run again. Regardless, they have now released the Kraken.

  60. Leo G says:

    The Politifact “fact check” is pants-on-fire lying.

    Politifactious, you might say.

  61. Matt says:

    And the cop was good, he shot to kill.

    He shot someone from virtually point blank who was climbing through a window frame – you don’t need to be any more than competent to be lethal in that situation.

  62. Fat Tony says:

    Matt
    Yes competent to hit a target at that range.
    But to kill someone unarmed and posing no threat to you at that range indicates something else – someone who has probably murdered others before

  63. Matt says:

    Or panicked

  64. Candy says:

    Killed before most likely. The calm steadiness, deliberateness. Something chilling about it to watch.
    Poor lady did not stand a chance.

  65. WDYSIA says:

    https://twitter.com/amuse/status/1349885882262761473

    CNN gonna have a tough time trying to explain themselves here.

    Latest is John Sullivan, the antifa guy who incited the crowd at the shooting, has been arrested and Trump has been briefed.

  66. Fat Tony says:

    Matt
    If he had panickef, he would most likely have missed.
    He was calm and deliberate.

  67. Some History says:

    Rex Mango
    #3725178, posted on January 15, 2021 at 1:39 pm
    Do wonder if Politifact ‘fact check’ noticed that Sullivan (the bravve war correspondent) filming the shooting, had a mate who quickly changed his shirt to escape when the girl went down & that the shooting was probably provoked by the bloke with the furry hat

    Some thoughts.

    Fluffy hat man is a major agitator if not the major agitator on the scene (and his buddy with the long yellow scarf that hands him the helmet). His presence is inflammatory, obnoxious, and unsettling. He is definitely NOT MAGA. He could be BLM/Antifa. But there’s an even nastier likelihood that he is an undercover police Agent Provocateur (AP).

    We do know more about fluffy hat man. He appears in a video in a different situation. This series of tweets looks at fluffy hat man. The tweeter arrives at the conclusion that fluffy hat man is an undercover police AP (see all 4 short videos).
    https://twitter.com/politicalwilli/status/1349083364729360384?s=19

    Particularly important is the first video. If you haven’t seen it, have a look. Fluffy hat man appears from behind the police line – he’s on the police side of the line. So, too, is Sullivan. Fluffy hat man seems chummy with Sullivan and the police are comfortable with both of them on the police side. Fluffy hat man is loud and “crazy like”. As soon as I saw him, it immediately reminded me that I’d seen something similar recently. During the Victoria covid lockdown, VicPol conducted itself highly aggressively towards the public, particularly those protesting the Hunchback. During one of these protests, there may have been 400-500 protesters in a park. They were minding their own business, not bothering anyone. Very quickly, police in numbers moved within a few metres of protesters. Coming from the back and the side of the police numbers was a man dressed in civvies and acting much like fluffy hat man. He would move from inside the police line and gesticulate and prance about to within centimetres of protesters, then prance back into the police numbers, then back to the protesters. On first seeing it, the questions were who is this guy and what’s he doing? He was in civvies but originated from the police side. It seems as though his role was to distract front line protesters from the police front line, and to get a physical reaction from protesters at which point police would pounce, heavy handed.

    There’s plenty of evidence that fluffy hat man is undercover police. He appears and is comfortable on the police side. In the Babbitt situation, he is belligerent with SWAT officers (his police colleagues) that were at the doorway/barricade that would be breached. Yet after the shooting he walks casually by the same officers on the stairway where he eventually changes clothes. Fluffy hat man was breaking the glass of the door with a helmet. The plain clothes police on the other side of the door that eventually shot Babbitt had his gun trained on fluffy hat man but didn’t shoot him.

    From the first video of the twitter series above, just in this one episode there are probably other undercover police APs. There’s another man in civvies and American flag hat on the police side. The 2 men on the far left that eventually pull fluffy hat man into the MAGA crowd could also be undercover police APs.

    Clean, clear pictures of fluffy hat man and his buddy (probably also undercover police) with the long, yellow scarf can be got from the videos. These are 2 critical characters. Have they been identified? Has it been made public? If they are undercover police APs that created a situation that got someone killed, it would understandably be explosive. If they are undercover police APs, would it be publicly divulged?

    There is evidence that BLM/Antifa agitators were present and it seems that there were also undercover police agitators.

  68. Some History says:

    WDYSIA
    #3725264, posted on January 15, 2021 at 3:42 pm
    https://twitter.com/amuse/status/1349885882262761473

    CNN gonna have a tough time trying to explain themselves here.

    WOW!

  69. Rex Mango says:

    S History, yeah just watched that twitter link & tend to agree. Fluffy hat bloke acts like a highly trained operator and leather coat lady seems to be in charge too. What is also odd is how the gun appears stage left like it’s 1940’s film noir. Then the gun shifts aim and shoots the girl dead. Who is fluffy hat man?

  70. Lee says:

    Funny how all those mocking claims of Antifa/BLM infiltration (like Astatine), or saying “nothing to see here”, in the last several days at the Cat have suddenly gone quiet in this thread.

  71. Rex Mango says:

    Never realised the girl with Sullivan is CNN. So it wasn’t MAGA inciting inssurection, it was actually Antifa/BLM/CNN.

  72. Some History says:

    HUGE! CNN-NPR Photo-Journalist Jade Sacker was Embedded with Antifa Leader John Sullivan During Siege of US Capitol – Cheered “We Did It!” After Inciting Riot (VIDEO)

    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/01/huge-cnn-npr-reporter-jade-sacker-embedded-antifa-leader-john-sullivan-siege-us-capitol-cheered-inciting-riot-video/

  73. Rex Mango says:

    5pm Friday so gotta get to pub, but that is a huge story about CNN inciting inssurection. How will Big Tech/MSM bury it.

  74. Old School Conservative says:

    How will Big Tech/MSM bury it.

    Just like The Australian is doing right now.
    Ignore it. Don’t mention it.

  75. Fat Tony says:

    Rex Mango
    #3725340, posted on January 15, 2021 at 5:00 pm
    5pm Friday so gotta get to pub, but that is a huge story about CNN inciting inssurection. How will Big Tech/MSM bury it.

    That’s easy – quickly and deep.

  76. Kim says:

    No need to waste energy with speculation as these issues will go to court. I notice that the lawyer for the guy with the horns and tattoos is claiming in defence that Trump instructed him to break into Congress. Given that the guy is a longtime Trump supporter it will be fascinating if he somehow comes out otherwise.

  77. Some History says:

    The FBI is looking for fluffy hat man

    https://twitter.com/Pug_Apu/status/1349494770658373636

  78. Kim says:

    Fluffy hat is son of a NY judge.

  79. Some History says:

    Kim
    #3725662, posted on January 15, 2021 at 8:47 pm

    Fluffy hat is son of a NY judge.

    Don’t think that’s the same man

    https://www.timesofisrael.com/rioter-in-fur-pelt-is-son-of-ny-jewish-judge-who-led-a-national-synagogue-group/

  80. Some History says:

    Kim
    #3725662, posted on January 15, 2021 at 8:47 pm

    Fluffy hat is son of a NY judge.

    Don’t think that’s the same man.

  81. Rex Mango says:

    Back from pub & can categorically state that Sydney on Friday night nowadays is deader than Tutankhamun. Did speak to two young well employed blokes & mentioned that the FBI had just picked up an Antifa guy eight days after the Capitol riot. They wouldn’t believe a word I said & tried to explain to me how Antifa were such great people etc. They also tried to lecture me about the concept of Antifa, as in righteous folk out to do good. Quite scary what these young people will believe.

  82. Armadillo says:

    Back from pub

    Quitter.

  83. Rex Mango says:

    Dillo, no individual person has put more effort into keeping the Sydney pub scene alive for the past decade than me. Sadly, on my watch I have seen it die.

  84. mh says:

    Rex, American kids have been dobbing-in their own families to authorities, telling them their parents took part in the Capitol protests. Then the kids brag about what they did on social media.

    They are as brainwashed as Hitler’s socialist youth.

  85. Rex Mango says:

    mh, yass do feel the bad guys have won. Only one solution, Aussie Crawl’s greatest track & good film clip too:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZI_SBFYbZ0

  86. Rex Mango says:

    Funniest part of talking to these young guys, was when they asked me if I knew what Antifa meant. I replied ‘Fascists who don’t like fascists’. They were horrified. Then I doubled down & said they were headkickers who liked kicking heads. Again, same reaction.

  87. Rex Mango says:

    Apologies, my last sentence should have read, headkickers who don’t like people kicking heads.

  88. Armadillo says:

    Punks. Wear the garb. Hunt in a pack.

    History is replete this stuff. ANTIFA is a well financed and organised mob.

Comments are closed.