Democrats want mentally erratic Biden to hand in his licence

This entry was posted in American politics, War and peace. Bookmark the permalink.

45 Responses to Democrats want mentally erratic Biden to hand in his licence

  1. Bazinga says:

    No way. If he’s too incompetent to be the sole button presser, then impeach him.

  2. Elizabeth (Lizzie) Beare says:

    That’s one Democrat motion I wouldn’t disagree with.

    In the current circumstances at least.

  3. Elizabeth (Lizzie) Beare says:

    They won’t impeach him – yet.

  4. H B Bear says:

    Like trying to get a drivers license off grandpa. Does anybody really think this dodderer is running the show? He probably struggles to get his legs right in his pants in the morning.

  5. Tim Neilson says:

    However meritorious the idea may be while Biden is in the Oval Office, it’s not a great idea in general. Anything which slows down a response to enemy aggression is just asking for trouble.

  6. Struth says:

    The problem is that he thinks the big red button is for calling the nurse.

  7. MPH says:

    More like the other Democrats want a piece of the action.

  8. Mother Lode says:

    Well there are only about two hours of the day that he is awake. Maybe they just want America to have the option for the other 22 hours.

    And in the two hours Joe is awake there is the danger he will think he is playing Super Mario again.

  9. Mique says:

    And I doubt that the system is quite so unsophisticated that Biden or any other President, or individual, actually gets his fingers anywhere near the actual “button”. As has been the case since the start of the Cold War, the prospect of mutually assured destruction has controlled trigger fingers in far more parlous times than these.

  10. calli says:

    Great. Nuclear War by committee.

    What could go wrong?

  11. Mother Lode says:

    It is alternative universe over at the Twatter thread.

    Someone making what passes for a point there on how dangerous it was over the last four years having that madman with the power.

    Trump went out of his way to build relationships with NK and Russia and pull America out of interminable wars. He was standing up to China but not through threatening with the military but economics.

    He was fostering peace between long time enemies, once again lowering tensions.

    And this person believes that Trump would have been a little too eager to press the button.

  12. egg_ says:

    What shape is the aging cold war arsenal in, anyway?

    Now submarine and B1 bomber based?

  13. Bruce of Newcastle says:

    It won’t work. He’ll just write an Executive Order overriding Congress like he’s done with fifty or so EOs in the last month. Tyranny sucks, doesn’t it?

  14. egg_ says:

    He’ll just write an Executive Order overriding Congress like he’s done with fifty or so EOs in the last month.

    As dictated by President Jill, according to Brian Craig.

  15. Goanna says:

    The military has command of the nuclear football.

    No President makes an unilateral decision because he might be delusional or held hostage for example.

  16. egg_ says:

    Naomi Wolf’s dream team just drove off a cliff with sleepy Joe at the wheel.

  17. Tom says:

    Great. Nuclear War by committee.
    What could go wrong?

    The White House is already being run by a committee of unelected loony left activists. They just want the 2021 version of the USA recognised as a socialist collective.

  18. lotocoti says:

    Unless I’m mistaken, the only time a president has sole authority is in a launch under fire scenario.
    Furthermore, confirmation and targeting remains in the hands of the Joint Chiefs.
    Even then, no single silo crew, bomber pilot or CO of a SSBN can unleash armageddon.
    It’s called fail safe.

  19. stackja says:

    Biden is only there short term.
    Comma LA takes over. Then someone else. And so on till 2024.

  20. Bruce of Newcastle says:

    Naomi Wolf’s dream team just drove off a cliff with sleepy Joe at the wheel.

    She’s suffering buyer’s remorse.

    Progressive feminist Naomi Wolf rips the Green New Deal as ‘fascism’ – ‘I WANT a Green New Deal’ but ‘this one is a straight up power grab’ (21 Feb)

    Lady you rigged the election like Venezuela and now you’re surprised that what you got was a totalitarian government? Sheesh.

  21. Leigh Lowe says:

    calli says:

    February 25, 2021 at 10:22 am

    Great. Nuclear War by committee.

    What could go wrong?

    This isn’t about Hiden.
    It is about neutering the office of President for ever and a day.

  22. egg_ says:

    Naomi Wolf’s dream team just drove off a cliff with sleepy Joe at the wheel.

    She’s suffering buyer’s remorse.

    And so, like a typical woman, she resorts to a “hard man” from the Right in Tucker Carlson to bash them.

  23. egg_ says:

    Their ABC’s Terry Lane, ex Religious Minister, interviewed Wolf live on air when she was promoting The Beauty Myth and candidly said on air afterwards that he thought she was nuts.

  24. pbw says:

    Calli,

    Great. Nuclear War by committee.
    What could go wrong?

    2/3 majority?

  25. Spurgeon Monkfish III says:

    he thought she was nuts

    Yet still decades off experiencing the joys of “The Gift”. Imagine all the poor li’l kitties who’ll be harmed during the course of that unprecedented insanity extravaganza …

  26. Robbo says:

    They should require Biden to get the approval of Homer Simpson before he pushes the button. After all Homer has a better grasp of such things than the old dribbler will ever have.

  27. Up The Workers! says:

    “The name’s Biden; Joe Biden – 007 – Licenced to Dill.”

  28. grumpy says:

    Easy fix. Just write an EO and get the most popular president evaaaah ™ to sign it. He has admitted he doesn’t know what he is signing so it will sail on through.

  29. Up The Workers! says:

    egg, at 10.25am said:

    “What shape is the aging cold war arsenal in, anyway?
    Now submarine and B1 bomber based?”

    Nah…with the Dementiacrats in charge, it is all strategic crack-cocaine pipe and tactical nuclear-spliff based.

  30. Texas Jack says:

    Leigh Lowe says:
    February 25, 2021 at 11:39 am

    This isn’t about Hiden.
    It is about neutering the office of President for ever and a day.

    Exactly, Leigh. Exactly!

    Ironically enough, Harry Truman maintained he’d given General MacArthur limited ability to use nukes during the Korean War. Amazingly, I haven’t seen any major effort to airbrush the only President to ever use nukes out of history just yet.

  31. Kneel says:

    “… “hard man” from the Right in Tucker Carlson…”

    Tucker isn’t “right”, if anything he is centre-left – and that by his own words in interviews where he is the “target”.
    BUT, he has also said that if there are 100 people in the room and only one disagrees about a particular topic, that is the one he will interview. He wants to hear and disseminate the “contrarian” viewpoint, not parrot the “party line”. And that is one of the things that make him a good (and popular) news reporter – ensuring all sides get heard.

  32. egg_ says:

    Kneel says:
    February 25, 2021 at 12:20 pm
    “… “hard man” from the Right in Tucker Carlson…”

    Tucker isn’t “right”, if anything he is centre-left – and that by his own words in interviews where he is the “target”.

    Fvck off, retard.

  33. egg_ says:

    A nuclear triad a three-pronged military force structure that consists of land-launched nuclear missiles, nuclear-missile-armed submarines, and strategic aircraft with nuclear bombs and missiles.[1] Specifically, these components are land-based intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs), and strategic bombers. The purpose of having this three-branched nuclear capability is to significantly reduce the possibility that an enemy could destroy all of a nation’s nuclear forces in a first-strike attack. This, in turn, ensures a credible threat of a second strike, and thus increases a nation’s nuclear deterrence.

  34. Leigh Lowe:

    This isn’t about Hiden.
    It is about neutering the office of President for ever and a day.

    It isn’t so much about neutering the office of the President – it’s about making retaliation to a First or a Decapitation strike, being made impossible.
    Remember also that President Trump was spectacularly unable to get rid of the O’Bama Generals from the US military. God only knows how many of these have been blackmailed into submission in their junior years by China/Russia.
    If O’Biden fails to do anything about China forcibly bringing Taiwan back to the fold, will Taiwan reassemble the basement nukes it has built* and strike back at China?
    And if China gets hit by a dozen or so nukes, will the US stand down when China decides to take out Washington and a few other targets? Pearl Harbour would be really nice to own even after an EMP.
    The US has just announced its incredible weakness and complete lack of will to defend itself.
    We haven’t been in these uncharted waters since pre 1939.
    * Taiwan doesn’t own any nukes, and doesn’t have the technology to build them,
    Ho Ho Ho.
    Just like Isreal.

  35. Spurgeon Monkfish III says:

    it’s about making retaliation to a First or a Decapitation strike, being made impossible

    Exactly. The implications of this are unsettling, to say the least.

  36. Damon says:

    If a backward mob like Iran can plausibly build a nuclear weapon, can anybody really believe that Israel and Taiwan, both under constant threat, couldn’t, or more realistically, haven’t?

  37. Crossie says:

    From what I understand two people are in possession of parts of launch codes so that one cannot do it accidentally.

  38. Zulu Kilo Two Alpha says:

    If a backward mob like Iran can plausibly build a nuclear weapon, can anybody really believe that Israel and Taiwan, both under constant threat, couldn’t, or more realistically, haven’t?

    The Isreali government had authorised the use of thirteen nuclear weapons against the “Arab” states during the “Yom Kippur” war of 1973……it was then that the United Staes decided to begin the resupply of weapons and equipment to the Israelis….

  39. Crossie says:

    The impossibility aside of launching a nuke accidentally, this is not so much an admission that Biden is non compos mentis but that Democrats want it out of any future Republican president’s authority. Seeing how they’ve got a lock on fraudulent elections I wouldn’t think that a Republican president is likely in our lifetimes.

  40. stackja says:

    USA election rules can be changed if enough people decide to stop the fraud.

  41. egg_ says:

    Seeing how they’ve got a lock on fraudulent elections I wouldn’t think that a Republican president is likely in our lifetimes.

    RINO Mitt Romney cheerfully predicting Trump’s preselection in 2024.
    Brian Craig scratching his head.

  42. Leigh Lowe says:

    Remain calm.
    The “nearly three dozen” members of Congress is actually 31.
    Out of a total of 535 members.
    It includes the usual suspects (Omar, Presley) and is no more than posturing to pockets of the hard left base in particular electoral districts.

  43. Baa Humbug says:

    This is just the far left dipping their toes in the water to see what new cause they can rally people around and raise money and support.
    Absolutely nothing will come of it except hot air and money for lefties.

  44. Andre Lewis says:

    The Democrats wanted exactly this sort of restraint in place when Trump was Pres. Its all about stopping any chance of the US using its military force against a communist country – even in retaliation.

Comments are closed.